Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41739332›Full record

SynthesisClinical reviews in allergy & immunology2026

Precision Medicine in Plant Food Allergy: a Systematic Review of Biomarkers Under a Clinical Approach.

M L Somoza, E Nuñez-Borque, I M Sánchez-Guerrero, O Uriel, E Marchan, M Belver, A Ruiz-Sánchez, R Jiménez-Saiz, M J Goikoetxea

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

M L Somoza *Department of Allergy, Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor, Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0141-8914
E Nuñez-Borque *Department of Immunology, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital Universitario La Princesa (IIS-Princesa), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), Madrid, Spain. enbli7@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2928-410X
I M Sánchez-GuerreroDepartment of Allergy, Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, Murcia, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2130-4268
O UrielDepartment of Allergy, Hospital Universitario Araba, Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain.
E MarchanDepartment of Allergy, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Toledo, Toledo, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-2317-5359
M BelverDepartment of Allergy, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, IIS-Princesa, Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2474-3557
A Ruiz-SánchezDepartment of Immunology, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital Universitario La Princesa (IIS-Princesa), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-4867-690X
R Jiménez-SaizDepartment of Immunology, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital Universitario La Princesa (IIS-Princesa), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0606-3251
M J GoikoetxeaDepartment of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2213-6999

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant food allergy (FA) is a major global health problem, being peanut one of the most studied allergenic foods worldwide. Biomarkers (Bms) are essential tools for precision medicine, guiding diagnosis, risk stratification, and treatment. However, evidence on their clinical applicability in plant FA remains limited and fragmented. Therefore, we aim to systematically review the Bms identified in plant FA related to several aspects of the pathology. This systematic review was performed in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. A comprehensive search was conducted in three databases (PubMed, Web of Sciences and Cochrane Library) between July 2019 and July 2024. Articles were screened using predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, and categorized into five thematic sections: sensitization, tolerance, threshold, severity and follow-up treatment. Risk-of-bias and certainty of evidence were assessed using validated tools and the GRADE approach. From the 733 articles found, 71 studies met inclusion criteria and were selected for data extraction. A majority of them were high-quality publications and predominantly involved pediatric cohorts from Europe and North America. Peanut was the most studied food, followed by nuts and wheat, while fruits and seeds were rarely represented. Across all sections, most of the studies were related to severity and tolerance. Specific IgE to whole extracts or molecular components were the most frequent Bms, followed by skin prick test. Emerging Bms were identified, although they remain in early validation stages. Risk-of-bias and certainty of evidence were primarily moderate, reflecting the exploratory nature of most of the included studies. This review highlights the predominance of classical Bms and the promise of novel candidates for future clinical integration. However, research remains allergen-, age- and region-restricted, underscoring the need for multicenter studies, representative patient samples, and validation of emerging Bms to achieve globally applicable precision medicine in plant FA.

Indexed as

AllergensFood HypersensitivityPrecision MedicineBiomarkersHumansImmunoglobulin EAllergensBiomarkersImmunoglobulin EBiomarkerComponent revolved diagnosisIgEPlant food allergyPrecision medicine

Identifiers

PMID41739332
PMCPMC12935746

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.