Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41739459›Full record

ArticleJAMA psychiatry2026

Mapping ADHD Heterogeneity and Biotypes by Topological Deviations in Morphometric Similarity Networks.

Nanfang Pan, Yajing Long, Kun Qin, Isaac Z Pope, Qiuxing Chen, Ziyu Zhu, Ying Cao, Lei Li, Manpreet K Singh, Robert K McNamara and 4 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Nanfang PanDepartment of Radiology, Huaxi MR Research Center, Institute of Radiology and Medical Imaging, Psychoradiology Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Research Unit of Psychoradiology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Yajing LongDepartment of Radiology, Huaxi MR Research Center, Institute of Radiology and Medical Imaging, Psychoradiology Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Research Unit of Psychoradiology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Kun QinDepartment of Radiology, Taihe Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, China.
Isaac Z PopeThe Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences and Monash Biomedical Imaging, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Qiuxing ChenDepartment of Radiology, Huaxi MR Research Center, Institute of Radiology and Medical Imaging, Psychoradiology Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Research Unit of Psychoradiology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Ziyu ZhuDepartment of Radiology, Huaxi MR Research Center, Institute of Radiology and Medical Imaging, Psychoradiology Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Research Unit of Psychoradiology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Ying CaoDepartment of Radiology, Huaxi MR Research Center, Institute of Radiology and Medical Imaging, Psychoradiology Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Research Unit of Psychoradiology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Lei LiDepartment of Radiology, Huaxi MR Research Center, Institute of Radiology and Medical Imaging, Psychoradiology Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Research Unit of Psychoradiology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Manpreet K SinghDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, Davis, Sacramento.
Robert K McNamaraDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Melissa P DelBelloDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Ying ChenDepartment of Radiology, Huaxi MR Research Center, Institute of Radiology and Medical Imaging, Psychoradiology Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Research Unit of Psychoradiology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Alex FornitoThe Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences and Monash Biomedical Imaging, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Qiyong GongDepartment of Radiology, Huaxi MR Research Center, Institute of Radiology and Medical Imaging, Psychoradiology Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Research Unit of Psychoradiology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is characterized by considerable clinical heterogeneity, and existing classification frameworks constrain the development of neurobiologically informed subtyping approaches. Objective: To investigate whether normative modeling of topological properties derived from brain morphometry similarity networks can provide robust stratification markers for children with ADHD. Design, Settings, and Participants: This case-control study leveraged multisite cross-sectional neurodevelopmental datasets with a longitudinal follow-up cognitive assessment for a subset. Morphometric similarity networks were constructed and normative models were developed for 3 topological metrics: degree centrality, nodal efficiency, and participation coefficient. Through semisupervised clustering, putative biotypes were delineated and their clinical profiles were examined. Brain profiles of these biotypes were further contextualized in terms of their neurochemical and functional correlates using large-scale databases, and model generalizability was assessed with external validation performed in an independent transdiagnostic cohort. Study data were analyzed from November 2023 to January 2025. Exposures: Normative modeling of topological properties derived from brain morphometry. Main Outcomes and Measures: Topological deviations in morphometric similarity networks derived from brain structural image. Results: The discovery cohort comprised 446 children with ADHD (mean [SD] age, 11.5 [2.6] years; 339 male [76.0%]) and 708 controls (mean [SD] age, 11.0 [2.3] years; 429 male [60.6%]), whereas the validation cohort included 554 children with ADHD (mean [SD] age, 10.1 [2.8]; 372 male [67.1%]) and 123 controls (mean [SD] age, 10.1 [3.0]; 70 male [56.9%]). ADHD exhibited atypical hub organization across all 3 topological metrics, with significant case-control differences primarily localized to a covarying multimetric component in the orbitofrontal cortex. Three biotypes emerged: severe-combined with emotional dysregulation (widespread medial prefrontal cortex-pallidum alterations, n = 142), predominantly hyperactive/impulsive (anterior cingulate cortex-pallidum circuit alterations, n = 177), and predominantly inattentive (superior frontal gyrus alterations, n = 127), each characterized by distinct clinical profiles and longitudinal trajectories. These neural profiles of each biotype showed distinct neurochemical and functional correlates. Critically, the core findings were replicated in the validation cohort, demonstrating robust generalizability. Conclusions and Relevance: Results of this case-control study reveal that the integration of normative modeling with semisupervised clustering provided both dimensional and categorical insights into ADHD heterogeneity, identifying 3 distinct ADHD biotypes with unique clinical-neural profiles that advance the understanding of ADHD's neurobiological complexity and lay the groundwork for personalized management.

Indexed as

Attention Deficit Disorder with HyperactivityBrainNerve NetAdolescentBrain MappingCase-Control StudiesChildCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMale

Identifiers

PMID41739459
PMCPMC12936971

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.