SynthesisBJS open2025
Impact of preoperative weight-loss interventions on outcomes after elective non-bariatric surgery: meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BJS open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundObesity disproportionately affects patients awaiting elective non-bariatric surgery and complicates perioperative management. This systematic review aimed to assess the impact of weight-loss interventions on intraoperative and postoperative outcomes.
methodsMEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and Web of Science databases were searched from inception to October 2025 for trials on weight-loss interventions. Two reviewers independently screened the studies, extracted relevant data, and assessed risk of bias. Pooled mean differences (MDs), standardized mean differences (SMDs), and odds ratios (ORs) were obtained from random-effects meta-analyses.
resultsThirty-five studies with 9378 participants (mean(standard deviation) age 58(8) years; body mass index 35.6(6.4) kg/m2; 61% women) were included. The median duration of intervention was 8 (interquartile range 4-14) weeks. Preoperative weight-loss interventions were significantly associated with a reduction in overall postoperative complications (odd ratio (OR) 0.63, 95% confidence interval (c.i.) 0.43 to 0.93; I² = 32%) and in complications requiring medical intervention graded as Clavien-Dindo ≥ II (OR 0.66, 0.51 to 0.86; I² = 0%). Additionally, they were linked to a decreased risk of postoperative non-infectious wound-related complications (OR 0.38, 0.15 to 0.97; I2 = 0%), and with reduced intraoperative blood loss in gastrectomy (SMD -0.98, 95% c.i. -1.47 to -0.48; I2 = 0%) and hepatectomy (SMD -0.41, -0.82 to 0.00; I2 = 0%). Reductions in blood transfusion (OR 0.49, 0.31 to 0.79; I² = 0%), hospital readmission rates (OR 0.57, 0.47 to 0.70; I² = 0%), and length of hospital stay (SMD -0.08, -0.13 to -0.04; I² = 0%) were also noted. No association was observed for surgical site infection, venous thromboembolism, or return to the emergency department. Compared with standard care or no intervention, weight-loss interventions led to greater weight loss (MD -3.92 (95% c.i. -5.44 to -2.39) kg; I2 = 91%), and fat mass loss (MD -4.78 (-6.49 to -3.06) kg; I2 = 0%) but no change in lean mass (SMD -0.25, -0.51 to 0.01; I2 = 0%). In a sensitivity analysis of studies at low risk of bias, the estimates and precision of most outcomes did not change materially.
conclusionDespite heterogeneity in study design and surgical populations, the evidence consistently demonstrated that weight-loss interventions are feasible, safe, and can reduce postoperative complications across various surgical specialties alongside improving many outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.