Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41739857›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2026

The Genetic Architecture of Venom Resistance: A Novel Approach to Target Identification and Coevolutionary Discovery.

Micaiah J Ward, Schyler A Ellsworth, Elizabeth G King, Enoch Ng'oma, Gunnar S Nystrom, Kylie C Lawrence, Lauren Maquet-Diafouka, Alex Oliver, Mark J Margres, Christopher L Parkinson and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Micaiah J WardDepartment of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9474-8615
Schyler A EllsworthDepartment of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8321-1158
Elizabeth G KingDivision of Biological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9393-4720
Enoch Ng'omaDivision of Biological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6741-7922
Gunnar S NystromDepartment of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5388-3634
Kylie C LawrenceDepartment of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA.ORCID 0009-0006-5646-8341
Lauren Maquet-DiafoukaDepartment of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA.ORCID 0009-0009-1314-9326
Alex OliverDepartment of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA.ORCID 0009-0009-3721-1374
Mark J MargresDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6153-6701
Christopher L ParkinsonDepartment of Biological Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2020-6992
Kimberly A HughesDepartment of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1549-4982
Darin R RokytaDepartment of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0356-2178

Funding

DEB 1145978DEB 1638902DEB 1822417DEB 2027446National Science Foundation CNS-1429294National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program 1449440
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

All species evolve under selective pressures that emerge from their interactions, often antagonistic, with other species. Phenotypes mediating species interactions manifest as the combined products of the genomes of interacting species; understanding the evolutionary processes acting in one lineage therefore cannot be attained without bridging the genomes of interacting species. Venoms have arisen independently more than 100 times in animals and serve diverse roles in species interactions, including predation and defense. Each venom is evolutionarily entwined with reciprocal phenotypes, such as venom resistance, in often diverse recipient species. Despite extensive work on venoms, the full genetic basis for resistance to whole venoms is largely unknown. Using the venom of the Florida blue centipede (Scolopendra viridis) comprised of 35 toxins and Drosophila melanogaster as model prey, we investigated the genetics of venom resistance for a naive prey through experimental evolution and genetic-mapping approaches. We identified 12 consensus genes across techniques associated with venom resistance, yet individual experiments suggested a genome-wide basis for resistance involving hundreds to thousands of genes, despite the relative simplicity of the venom of S. viridis. We found no evidence for fitness trade-offs associated with the evolution of resistance and revealed a stark contrast in the nature of venom resistance between prey sexes. The disparity in resistance genetics between prey sexes as well as the relative genetic complexity of venom versus resistance may ultimately give venomous predators a coevolutionary advantage over their prey.

Indexed as

ArthropodsArthropod VenomsBiological CoevolutionAnimalsBiological EvolutionDrosophila melanogasterEvolution, MolecularFemaleMalePhenotypePredatory BehaviorArthropod VenomscoevolutionDrosophilaexperimental evolutionresistancevenom

Identifiers

PMID41739857
PMCPMC12978544

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.