Evidence mapPaperPMID 41739969Full record

ReviewChemical reviews2026

Conformational Flexibility of Transmembrane Helices: How it Works and Where it Matters.

Dieter Langosch

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Chemical reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Dieter LangoschTechnical University of Munich, School of Life Sciences, Alte Akademie 8, 85354 Freising, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8098-0015

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An increasing number of multipass and oligomeric membrane proteins is found to exist in different structural substates that represent different stages of their functional cycles. Many of their constituent transmembrane helices locally deviate from canonical α-helical structure, suggesting that their conformational flexibility is required for function and/or connected to structural conversions between functional states. Biological functions of many single-pass proteins also often depend on the substantial conformational flexibility of their transmembrane helices. Current research focuses on the types and sequence dependence of helix flexibility, its diverse functional roles, as well as its interplay with the lipid environment within a membrane. This Perspective will illustrate these issues using a number of exemplary cases, including bacteriorhodopsin, ion channels, fusogenic proteins, and intramembrane protease substrates. In addition, we will discuss some methodological aspects, including advanced hydrogen-deuterium exchange analysis that can be useful in investigating the conformational flexibility of TM-helices.

Indexed as

Membrane ProteinsBacteriorhodopsinsHumansModels, MolecularProtein ConformationProtein Structure, SecondaryBacteriorhodopsinsMembrane Proteins

Identifiers

PMID41739969
PMCPMC12983209

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.