Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41740168›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2026

Urban Care Farming to Enhance Quality of Life Among Older Adults: Protocol for a Waitlist Randomized Trial.

Cynthia Chen, Jocelin Lam, Zhenye Shi, Katika Akksilp, Su Aw, Mary Foong-Fong Chong, Choon Nam Ong, Angelia Sia, Leng Leng Thang, Xin Kai Tham and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Cynthia ChenSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, 12 Science Drive 2, 09-01T, Singapore, 117549, Singapore, (65) 6601 5526.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1947-8069
Jocelin LamSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, 12 Science Drive 2, 09-01T, Singapore, 117549, Singapore, (65) 6601 5526.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5166-4737
Zhenye ShiSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, 12 Science Drive 2, 09-01T, Singapore, 117549, Singapore, (65) 6601 5526.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-2543-2478
Katika AkksilpHealth Intervention and Technology Assessment Program, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7270-8820
Su AwSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, 12 Science Drive 2, 09-01T, Singapore, 117549, Singapore, (65) 6601 5526.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5690-8830
Mary Foong-Fong ChongSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, 12 Science Drive 2, 09-01T, Singapore, 117549, Singapore, (65) 6601 5526.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0587-2505
Choon Nam OngSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, 12 Science Drive 2, 09-01T, Singapore, 117549, Singapore, (65) 6601 5526.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4002-1725
Angelia SiaCentre for Urban Greenery and Ecology Research, National Parks Board, Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5982-6606
Leng Leng ThangFaculty of Arts & Social Sciences, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8458-8769
Xin Kai ThamTerrapy SG, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-5848-5456
JunXiang PongHort Therapeutics, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-3908-8622
Kartini OmarCentre for Urban Greenery and Ecology Research, National Parks Board, Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-7735-2168
Joan HungCentre for Urban Greenery and Ecology Research, National Parks Board, Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-5864-0949
Marek KukumbergHealthy Longevity Translational Research Programme, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9291-3004
Roger HoDivision of Life Science (LIFS), Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HKUST), Clear Water Bay, Hong Kong, China (Hong Kong).ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9629-4493
Elizabeth DiehlDepartment of Environmental Horticulture, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7501-3429

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Population aging poses challenges to health systems and costs, and evidence shows that older adults spend a long time in ill health. Improving healthspan, time spent in good health, allows older adults to contribute and improve in their quality of life. Active and healthy aging are crucial to improving healthspan. Urban care farming (UCF) is a behavioral intervention that is purported to enhance active and healthy aging. Objective: This trial evaluates the effectiveness of a care farming intervention in improving the quality of life and biopsychosocial health outcomes of older participants. Methods: We conducted a parallel group, 2-arm pragmatic waitlist randomized trial with a 1:1 allocation, in which participants were randomized into either the intervention or waitlist control arm. Community-dwelling participants aged 50-85 years, without any mobility issues, were recruited. Participants in the intervention arm commenced the 24-week UCF program, while waitlist control participants received no intervention during this period. The primary (World Health Organization Quality of Life-brief version) and secondary outcomes were collected at baseline, 6th month, and 12th month after the intervention group completed the trial. Secondary outcomes include objectively measured physiological outcomes, cognition, frailty, and self-reported psychosocial outcomes. Intervention effects were estimated using mixed-effects difference-in-differences regression to account for repeated measurements. Results: The randomized controlled trial commenced in April 2024, with the intervention group starting first. By April 2024, we had enrolled 137 participants at commencement, with 67 participants randomized to the intervention group and 70 to the control group. The intervention arm started in April 2024 and concluded in September 2024. Baseline data were collected in March 2024, and 6-month follow-up data were collected in September 2024. The waitlist control participants began the UCF intervention at the end of September 2024 and concluded in April 2025. Data collection for the 12-month follow-up concluded in May 2025. Analysis of the baseline and 6-month follow-up data is still ongoing. Conclusions: The outcomes of this study will contribute to the understanding of UCF on quality of life and health. This trial has potential positive implications for public health, as it utilizes a robust research design and methods to provide empirical insights into the multifaceted health benefits of the multicomponent UCF intervention. This trial could also serve as a model for future intervention research on scalable, community-based programs. Taken together, the UCF content and the outcomes, process, and economic evaluations completed through this study could inform scalable models of the UCF intervention, with potential implications for public health strategies to address health issues related to population aging.

Indexed as

biopsychosocial healthcomplex interventionhealthy and active agingquality of lifeurban care farming

Identifiers

PMID41740168
PMCPMC12935458

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.