ArticleJournal of biomechanics2026
Mesenchymal stem cells differentiate dynamic from static load through variable regulation of the Hippo pathway.
Article in Journal of biomechanics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The mechanical environment of a cell, which profoundly influences cell behaviors, includes loading parameters such as magnitude, rate cycle number and duration. Time-varying, or dynamic, levels of load are generally associated with anabolic responses, while time invariant, or static, forces often increase catabolic pathophysiology. How cells differentiate between static and dynamic loading parameters is unclear. In mesenchymal stem cells (MSC), we found that static strain (SS) increased nuclear YAP at 3 h, whereas 200 cycles of dynamic strain (DS) did not. Differences in nuclear YAP were directed by phosphorylation of Hippo enzymes: SS promoted association of PP2Ac dephosphorylase with nuclear MST1/2. In contrast, DS activated Hippo signaling with phosphorylation of MST1/2 and YAP. Actin remodeling was differentially affected by DS and SS: DS generated thicker fibers with greater cross-sectional area and enhanced parallel alignment. In contrast, static strain reinforced the existing isotropic actin network by increasing fiber density and focal adhesion count. DS induced actin remodeling was associated with phosphorylation of both LATS1/2 and AMOT, which binds both actin and nuclear MST1/2. When LATS1/2 was inhibited, or AMOT was knocked down, nuclear PP2Ac increased and YAP was dephosphorylated. This suggests that DS induced actin remodeling provokes release of phosphorylated AMOT from actin binding sites, while SS induced actin reinforcement sequesters AMOT. In sum, our data shows that MSC are equipped to differentiate between load components, resulting in nuanced mechanical effects on the Hippo pathway.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.