Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41741481›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Towards deep-learning based detection and quantification of intestinal metaplasia on digitized gastric biopsies: a multi-expert comparative study.

Fabian Cano, Mauricio Caviedes, Andres Siabatto, Jesus Villarreal, Jose Quijano, Álvaro Bedoya-Urresta, Marino Coral Bedoya, Yomaira Yepez Caicedo, Angel Cruz-Roa, Fabio A González and 2 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Fabian CanoComputer Imaging and Medical Applications Laboratory-Cim@lab, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá D.C., Colombia.
Mauricio CaviedesComputer Imaging and Medical Applications Laboratory-Cim@lab, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá D.C., Colombia.
Andres SiabattoComputer Imaging and Medical Applications Laboratory-Cim@lab, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá D.C., Colombia.
Jesus VillarrealComputer Imaging and Medical Applications Laboratory-Cim@lab, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá D.C., Colombia.
Jose QuijanoComputer Imaging and Medical Applications Laboratory-Cim@lab, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá D.C., Colombia.
Álvaro Bedoya-UrrestaFundación Centro de Investigación de Enfermedades Digestivas y Nutricionales-CIEDYN, Pasto, Colombia.
Marino Coral BedoyaFundación Centro de Investigación de Enfermedades Digestivas y Nutricionales-CIEDYN, Pasto, Colombia.
Yomaira Yepez CaicedoFundación Centro de Investigación de Enfermedades Digestivas y Nutricionales-CIEDYN, Pasto, Colombia.
Angel Cruz-RoaGITECX Research Group & Automatic Data-driven Analytics Laboratory-AdaLab, Universidad de los Llanos, Meta, Colombia.
Fabio A GonzálezMachine Learning, Perception and Discovery Lab-Mindlab, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá D.C., Colombia.
Satish E ViswanathDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, USA.
Eduardo RomeroComputer Imaging and Medical Applications Laboratory-Cim@lab, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá D.C., Colombia. edromero@unal.edu.co.

Funding

Ministerio de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación No. 920 of 2022Sistema General de Regalías de Colombia 2019000100060Universidad Nacional de Colombia National Call for Proposals Bank for the Consolidation of Centers of Excellence 2020-2021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current gastric cancer (GCa) risk systems are prone to errors since they evaluate a visual estimation of intestinal metaplasia percentages in histopathology images of gastric mucosa to assign a risk. This study presents an automated method to detect and quantify intestinal metaplasia using deep convolutional neural networks as well as a comparative analysis with visual estimations of three pathologists. Gastric samples were collected from two different cohorts: 149 asymptomatic volunteers from a region with a high prevalence of GCa in Colombia and 56 patients from a tertiary hospital. Deep learning models were trained to classify intestinal metaplasia, and predictions were used to estimate a percentage of intestinal metaplasia and to assign an adapted OLGIM stage. Atrophy was not assessed because of the limited reproducibility among pathologists. Results were compared with independent blinded metaplastic assessments performed by three graduated pathologists. The best-performing deep learning architecture classified intestinal metaplasia with F1-Score of [Formula: see text] and AUC of [Formula: see text]. Among pathologists, inter-observer agreement by a Fleiss's Kappa score ranged from 0.20 to 0.48. In comparison, agreement between the pathologists and the best-performing model ranged from 0.12 to 0.35. Deep learning models show potential to reliably detect and quantify the percentage of intestinal metaplasia, achieving high classification performance. In practice, visual estimation is still the only available method, yet it is marked by considerable inter-observer variability. Deep learning models provide consistent estimates that could help reduce this subjectivity in risk stratification.

Indexed as

Deep LearningGastric MucosaStomach NeoplasmsAdultBiopsyColombiaFemaleHumansMaleMetaplasiaMiddle AgedObserver VariationReproducibility of ResultsAgreementDeep learningIntestinal metaplasia

Identifiers

PMID41741481
PMCPMC13009521

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.