Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41741609›Full record

Observational studyScientific reports2026

One-year outcomes of an innovative laparoscopic pectopexy procedure using inverted T-mesh for treatment of advanced uterine and anterior vaginal prolapse.

Evelyn Yang, Ching-Pei Tsai, Pao-Sheng Shen, Tsung-Ho Ying, Tsung-Hsien Lee, Gin-Den Chen, Yun-Han Liao, Man-Jung Hung

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07411898 (One-year Outcomes of an Innovative Laparoscopic Pectopexy Procedure Using Inverted T-mesh for Treatment of Advanced Uterine and Anterior Vaginal Prolapse.), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07411898 active not recruitingnot on this map

One-year Outcomes of an Innovative Laparoscopic Pectopexy Procedure Using Inverted T-mesh for Treatment of Advanced Uterine and Anterior Vaginal Prolapse.

TypeobservationalSponsorChung Shan Medical UniversityRan2020 to 2026Enrolled67ConditionsPelvic Organ Prolapse, Pelvic Organ Prolapse Vaginal Surgery, Pectopexy, SacrocolpopexyArmsLaparoscopic pectopexy, Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Evelyn YangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, No. 110, Section 1, Jianguo N Rd, South District, Taichung City, Taiwan, ROC.
Ching-Pei TsaiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, No. 1650, Section 4, Taiwan Boulevard, Taichung, Taiwan, ROC.
Pao-Sheng ShenDepartment of Statistics, Tunghai University, No. 1727, Section 4, Taiwan Boulevard, Taichung City, Taiwan, ROC.
Tsung-Ho YingDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, No. 110, Section 1, Jianguo N Rd, South District, Taichung City, Taiwan, ROC.
Tsung-Hsien LeeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, No. 110, Section 1, Jianguo N Rd, South District, Taichung City, Taiwan, ROC.
Gin-Den ChenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, No. 110, Section 1, Jianguo N Rd, South District, Taichung City, Taiwan, ROC.
Yun-Han Liao *Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, No. 110, Section 1, Jianguo N Rd, South District, Taichung City, Taiwan, ROC.
Man-Jung Hung *Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, No. 110, Section 1, Jianguo N Rd, South District, Taichung City, Taiwan, ROC. adiposehung@gmail.com.

Funding

Chung Shan Medical University Hospital CSH-2021-A-028Rong Sing Medical Foundation RSMF-1090121; RSMF-1110281; RSMF-1110289; RSMF-1120458
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This prospective pilot study was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of an innovative laparoscopic pectopexy (LP) technique employing an inverted T-mesh for the concomitant treatment of advanced uterine and anterior vaginal prolapse. 42 patients (62.7%) underwent the innovative LP procedure, while 25 patients (37.3%) with predominant uterine or vaginal vault prolapse underwent conventional laparoscopic sacral hysteropexy or colpopexy (LS). The primary outcome was the anatomic outcomes and functional results. Secondary outcomes included surgical complications and reoperations. At baseline, the demographics of the LP group was younger, with lower body mass index (BMI), and were more sexually active when compared to the LS group (P < 0.05). At one-year follow-up, the anatomic cure rate (POP-Q stage < 2) was significantly lower in the LP group (78.6% [33/42] vs. 92.0% [23/25]; P = 0.0108). Functional outcomes were assessed using the PFDI-20, POPIQ-7 and PISQ-12 questionnaires, and significant improvements were observed in all domains. Multiple logistic regression revealed that the type of surgical procedure was not a significant predictor of outcome. Levator avulsion was the only variable significantly associated with poorer results (P < 0.05). Both groups demonstrated favorable postoperative outcomes, and had no severe surgical complications. Limitations of this study included non-randomization of the sample groups, small sample size and a follow-up time of one year. Despite these limitations, the findings suggest that the innovative LP procedure is a safe and feasible option for the concomitant management of advanced uterine and anterior vaginal prolapse. However, levator ani avulsion markedly increases the risk of anatomic recurrence. This study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT07411898; 13/02/2026).

Indexed as

LaparoscopySurgical MeshUterine ProlapseAgedFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsPostoperative ComplicationsProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeLaparoscopyLevator avulsionPectopexyPelvic organ prolapseSacrocolpopexy

Identifiers

PMID41741609
PMCPMC13046823

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.