ArticleBMC microbiology2026
Gut microbiota characteristics and its biological function analysis in patients with tuberculosis and diabetes mellitus co-morbidity.
Article in BMC microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Tuberculosis and diabetes mellitus co-morbidity (TB_DM) poses harmful for human health and not conducive to early control. The gut microbiota has been proven to play an important role in a variety of diseases. In this study, we investigated the characteristics of the intestinal flora according to 16s rRNA sequencing results in their fecal samples in TB_DM, screened out independent bacterial genera to determine their diagnostic alone and in combination and explore their biological functions. A total 128 patients of 40 patients with diabetes mellitus (DM group), 40 patients with tuberculosis (TB group), 48 patients with TB_DM who met inclusion and exclusion criteria and 40 healthy persons as control group (HC group). We found that the sparse curves of the four groups were stable. The OTU analysis showed the most genus classification in the HC group and the least ones in the TB_DM group. Compared with the HC group, the α and β diversity were significantly decreased in the DM, TB and TB_DM group, particularly in TB_DM group. In the screening of independent genera, top 14 differential genera were found between the DM and the TB_DM group and top 18 ones between the TB and the TB_DM group.The top 3 bacterial genera Enterococcus, Flavonifractor and Romboutsia between DM and TB_DM groups were identified for analyzing diagnostic efficacy. The AUC, 95%CI, sensitivity and specificity were 0.742, 0.638 ~ 0.846, 64.58% and 80.00% in Enterococcus; 0.663, 0.547 ~ 0.779, 75.00% and 60.00% in Flavonifractor; 0.646, 0.530 ~ 0.762, 54.17% and 77.50% in Romboutsia and 0.835, 0.752 ~ 0.918, 79.17% and 75.00% in combined them, respectively. Also, the top 3 different genera Paeniclostridium, Dialister, and Lachnospira were found between TB and TB_DM groups for evaluating above diagnostic efficacy. The AUC, 95%CI, sensitivity and specificity were 0.716, 0.607 ~ 0.824, 81.25% and 57.50% in Paeniclostridium; 0.689, 0.575 ~ 0.803, 87.50% and 50.00% in Dialister; 0.672, 0.557–0.786, 83.33% and 55.00% in Lachnospira; and 0.914, 0.853 ~ 0.975, 85.42% and 85.00% in combined them, respectively. PICRUSt2 analysis indicated that differentially expressed genes (DEGs) predominantly influenced porphyrin and chlorophyll metabolism, pantothenate and CoA biosynthesis, as well as D-alanine metabolism between the DM and TB_DM groups. Furthermore, the DEGs were primarily associated with porphyrin and chlorophyll metabolism, Alzheimer’s disease and carotenoid biosynthesis when comparing the TB group to the TB_DM group. Our results provide key insights into the intestinal flora diversity, function and its independent genus in distinguishing TB_DM, TB and DM patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.