ArticleBMC geriatrics2026
A longitudinal cohort study: developing an interpretable machine learning model to predict incident depression risk in elderly Chinese patients with gastrointestinal or chronic liver diseases.
Article in BMC geriatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Machine learning-based diagnostic models for prevalent metabolic syndrome among patients with disuse muscle atrophy: a comparative study of seven algorithms.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDepression is highly prevalent in elderly patients with gastrointestinal (GID) or chronic liver diseases (CLD), significantly impairing quality of life and treatment outcomes. This study aimed to develop and validate an interpretable machine learning (ML) model to identify depression risk in this population, overcoming the “black box” limitation of conventional ML. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis prospective analysis utilized data from the baseline (2018) and follow-up (2020) waves of the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS). Potential predictors measured at baseline were selected via Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression. The outcome was incident depression at the 2020 follow-up, defined by a CES-D-10 score ≥ 10 among participants free of depression at baseline. Ten ML algorithms were employed to construct models. Performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, precision, F1-score, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis. The SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) framework interpreted feature contributions.
resultsAmong 1,353 participants (424 with depression), LASSO identified 10 key predictors. The Logistic Regression (LR) model demonstrated optimal discriminative performance, with an AUC of 0.723 (95% CI: 0.674–0.772). SHAP analysis revealed the top five predictors: self-reported health, life satisfaction, gender, education, and memory scores.
conclusionsWe developed an interpretable ML model for predicting depression risk in elderly patients with GID or CLD. This tool aids early detection and intervention, potentially improving clinical outcomes in this vulnerable population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.