ArticleImplementation science communications2026
Organizational readiness for implementing infection control in European hospitals: insights from Coincidence Analysis.
Article in Implementation science communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Factor selection in configurational comparative analysis - guidance for implementation researchers.Implementation science communications · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHealthcare-associated infections (HAIs) are a threat to public health, however, infection prevention and control (IPC) interventions have been shown to prevent a substantial portion of HAIs. Due to the interrelatedness of IPC intervention components, multifaceted implementation strategies, and contextual factors, IPC implementation is intricate. Organizational readiness for change (ORC) has been labelled as critical to ensure successful implementation, yet it is unclear under which conditions this is the case. We aim to examine if ORC is a necessary and/or sufficient condition for IPC implementation in REVERSE, a study aimed at decreasing multidrug-resistant HAIs in Europe.
methodsWe conducted a crisp-set Coincidence Analysis on data from the 24 hospitals enrolled in REVERSE to examine necessary and sufficient conditions for IPC implementation. We collected quantitative data on change complexity, implementation leadership, ORC, and sustainability. Implementation strategies used, as well as both theory-based outcomes of initiation and cooperative behavior, were assessed qualitatively. Models were selected based on theoretical grounds, fit indices, and case knowledge.
resultsTwelve hospitals (50%) had high IPC implementation initiation. We found two alternative pathways explaining this outcome. When hospitals implemented highly complex IPC practices, they needed high ORC levels to initiate change. When complexity was low, ORC did not shape initiation, but sites rather had to show clearly matched implementation barriers and strategies to initiate IPC. Results for cooperative behavior were inconclusive.
conclusionsUsing a novel cross-case configurational approach, we uncovered the role of ORC for IPC implementation. We found that ORC is of importance under the condition of highly complex change. When change complexity is low, solidifying ORC is dispensable, and efforts should instead be directed towards a thoughtful and targeted selection of implementation strategies based on identified barriers. These findings have implications for implementers and decision-makers, who may allocate resources based on whether IPC implementation is anticipated to be of high complexity or not, to ensure proper IPC implementation to address HAIs.
trial registrationREVERSE was registered with the "International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number" (ISRCTN) register under Nr. 12956554 on 11.11.2021, https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN12956554 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.