Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41742732›Full record

ReviewGeriatrics & gerontology international2026

Shared Decision Making and Advance Care Planning in the Context of Promoting Home Medical Care in Japan: A Narrative Review.

Hisayuki Miura, Yuko Goto

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Geriatrics & gerontology international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hisayuki MiuraClinical Research Center, Yushoukai Medical Corporation, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4780-9857
Yuko GotoClinical Research Center, Yushoukai Medical Corporation, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

Yushoukai Mediacal Corporation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Japan's rapidly aging population has heightened the need for high-quality home medical care based on patient-centered care (PCC). Shared decision making (SDM) and advance care planning (ACP) are essential processes for achieving PCC; however, their implementation in Japan remains limited. This narrative review summarizes theoretical foundations, international evidence, and current challenges in SDM and ACP, and discusses future directions for their integration into Japanese home medical care. Globally, SDM has been promoted through decision aids and policy initiatives, yet barriers such as limited consultation time, insufficient provider support, and variability in outcome measurement persist. In Japan, although professional societies have issued guidelines to promote SDM and ACP, awareness and adoption remain inadequate, partly due to entrenched informed consent practices, provider knowledge gaps, and limited patient involvement. ACP in home care has demonstrated benefits-including enhanced caregiver security, improved patient-provider communication, and greater support for home-based end-of-life care-yet real-world implementation is inconsistent. Cultural factors, such as family-centered decision making and reluctance to discuss death, further constrain uptake. Evidence increasingly emphasizes the need for integrating SDM and ACP as a continuous, iterative process, enabling both advance preparation and real-time decision making. Training programs incorporating SDM skills have shown potential to shift provider behavior toward PCC. Emerging digital and AI-based tools may expand opportunities for structured conversations and preference documentation. Advancing SDM and ACP in Japanese home medical care will require system-level reforms, workforce training, and ICT-supported care models. Japan's experience may also provide insights for other rapidly aging societies.

Indexed as

Advance Care PlanningDecision Making, SharedHome Care ServicesHumansJapanPatient-Centered Careadvance care planninghome medical careshared decision making

Identifiers

PMID41742732
PMCPMC12936636

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.