ArticleHealth science reports2026
Comprehensive Comparison of Features of Robotic Surgery Systems in Abdominal Surgeries: A Narrative Review Study.
Article in Health science reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Over the past two decades, robotic-assisted abdominal surgery has revolutionized the field of abdominal surgery. This narrative review aims to provide a comprehensive and current analysis of the latest robotic surgery systems employed in abdominal procedures, emphasizing their design, capabilities, and unique features. Methods: We conducted a systematic search using PubMed, Google, and manufacturer websites, utilizing keywords such as robotic surgery, robotic-assisted surgery, and specific robotic systems including da Vinci, Hugo, Versius, Flex, Senhance, Revo-I, MicroHand S, Hinotori, Avatera, Bitrack, ENOS (SPORT), MIRA, Mantra, Medrobotics Flex, Dexter, Saroa, Toumai, SHURUI, and Sina Results: Our review identified and analyzed 19 robotic systems from various countries, including the United States, Japan, South Korea, Iran, and China. This review not only highlights the features of these emerging robotic surgery systems but also delves into less-studied systems, such as the Saroa and Sina Conclusion: Robotic-assisted abdominal surgery continues to advance, offering greater precision and reduced invasiveness. Although high costs remain a challenge, ongoing technological progress and the introduction of new systems are improving both accessibility and performance. With the growing integration of artificial intelligence, robotic surgery is expected to become even more efficient, ultimately supporting surgeons and enhancing patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.