Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41743290›Full record

ArticleFood chemistry. Molecular sciences2026

Multi-omics integration characterizes meat quality differences between duroc × wujin × yorkshire and duroc × landrace × yorkshire pigs.

Keren Long, Zhanggui Zeng, Yingli Long, Yuanyuan Shen, Cheng Meng, Yuhao Gao, Tian Tian, Xingyu Zhou, Yiren Gu, Peng Shang and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Food chemistry. Molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Keren LongState Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, College of Animal Science and Technology, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, PR China.
Zhanggui ZengState Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, College of Animal Science and Technology, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, PR China.
Yingli LongState Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, College of Animal Science and Technology, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, PR China.
Yuanyuan ShenState Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, College of Animal Science and Technology, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, PR China.
Cheng MengState Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, College of Animal Science and Technology, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, PR China.
Yuhao GaoState Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, College of Animal Science and Technology, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, PR China.
Tian TianState Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, College of Animal Science and Technology, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, PR China.
Xingyu ZhouState Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, College of Animal Science and Technology, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, PR China.
Yiren GuKey Laboratory of Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau Animal Genetic Resource Reservation and Utilization, Ministry of Education, Southwest Minzu University, Chengdu 610041, PR China.
Peng ShangAnimal Science College, Xizang Agriculture and Animal Husbandry University, Linzhi 860000, PR China.
Shuquan LiuSichuan Gaojin Food Co, Ltd., Suining, 629300, PR China.
Xun ZhouState Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, College of Animal Science and Technology, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, PR China.
Ling ZhaoCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, PR China.
Anan JiangState Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, College of Animal Science and Technology, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, PR China.
Xun WangState Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, College of Animal Science and Technology, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, PR China.
Mingzhou LiState Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, College of Animal Science and Technology, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, PR China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Improving pork quality is a core objective in modern pig breeding programs, and the introduction of Chinese indigenous pig lineages represents a significant strategy for enhancing meat quality. Building on the well-established consensus that meat quality traits exhibit distinct phenotypic differences between lean-type and fat-type pig breeds, we hypothesized that incorporating Wujin pig lineages into DWY (Duroc × Wujin × Yorkshire) pigs can improve meat quality traits to a certain extent via the regulation of lipid metabolism networks, compared with DLY (Duroc × Landrace × Yorkshire) pigs. To explore this, integrated transcriptomic and proteomic analyses were conducted to systematically identify key regulators underlying these variances. Phenotypic evaluations revealed that DWY pigs exhibited significantly higher intramuscular fat content (IMF), enhanced water-holding capacity (WHC), and improved meat color relative to DLY pigs. Furthermore, fatty acid profiling revealed elevated levels of oleic acid (C18:1n9) and linoleic acid (C18:2n6c) in DWY pigs. Transcriptomic analysis showed that up-regulated differentially expressed genes in DWY pigs were primarily enriched in pathways related to lipid metabolism and cytoskeletal organization. Proteomic analysis further identified differentially accumulated proteins associated with the skeletal muscle cytoskeleton. Key candidate genes, including

Indexed as

Chinese indigenous pigsIntramuscular fatProteomicsTranscriptomicsWater-holding capacity

Identifiers

PMID41743290
PMCPMC12930170

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.