Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41743655›Full record

ArticleAdvances in health information science and practice2026

Challenges Associated With the Use of Electronic Health Record Systems for Health Service Delivery in Ghana.

Edward Agyemang, Kobina Esia-Donkoh, Addae Boateng Adu-Gyamfi, Emmanuel Kusi Achampong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in health information science and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Edward AgyemangMinistry of Health, Ghana.
Kobina Esia-DonkohDepartment of Population and Health, Faculty of Social Sciences, College of Humanities and Legal Studies, University of Cape Coast, Ghana.
Addae Boateng Adu-GyamfiDepartment of Population and Health, Faculty of Social Sciences, College of Humanities and Legal Studies, University of Cape Coast, Ghana.
Emmanuel Kusi AchampongDepartment of Medical Education and IT, School of Medical Sciences, College of Health and Allied Sciences, University of Cape Coast, Ghana.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Globally, digital health holds immense potential for transforming health-care delivery and improving patient outcomes, including enhanced care, increased mobility of records, reduced costs, and efficient recordkeeping. In this study, the authors sought to explore the challenges associated with the use of the electronic health record (EHR) Lightwave Health Information Management System (LHIMS) for health service delivery in Ghana. Methods: The authors used a nonprobability purposive sampling technique (expert sampling) to sample 30 unit heads from the study population. Results: The software challenges included inconsistency in report generation and a lack of standardization in system features, functions, and data capturing. The EHR (LHIMS) is also dependent on computer devices, and inadequate or malfunctioning devices pose a challenge to its effectiveness. Power interruptions can disrupt the work process and even affect patient outcomes. Conclusions: The challenges associated with the use of the EHR (LHIMS) in Ghana are issues that could have been resolved at the beginning of the implementation of the EHR if all the players had been involved in the process.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareElectronic Health RecordsDigital HealthGhanaHumansSoftwarechallengeselectronic health recordshardwareLightwave Health Information Management Systemsoftware

Identifiers

PMID41743655
PMCPMC12933431

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.