ArticleFrontiers in immunology2026
Simulation of prospective PIRCHE-II molecular matching in Canada: a feasibility study.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Organ allocation to minimize Human Leukocyte Antigens (HLA) disparity between donor and recipient has been shown to improve outcomes but is limited by the enormous HLA diversity. PIRCHE-II in silico model considers the HLA peptide binding characteristics of recipients to quantitate molecular compatibility. Having previously published the feasibility of including B-cell eplets into simplified, simulated match algorithms, here we assess the feasibility of using PIRCHE-II epitope optimised allocation, in a cohort of ~1500 heterogenous renal patients and donors within the National Canadian organ transplant program. Methods: This test-bed-only analysis provides critical first steps to understanding if prospective matching is indeed feasible, in a Canadian transplant population. Results: Simplified base-case simulation models optimizing for PIRCHE-II score demonstrate that molecular matching across all 5 HLA gene loci (A, B, C, DR, DQ) is achievable in <10% of patients, and hence would not be realistic for clinical allocation. In contrast, molecular matching with a low PIRCHE-II score at the principal HLA class II DRB1 or DQB1 loci may be achieved in over 90% of patients compared with the base-case scenario. Discussion: In reality, the precise matching probability is governed by multiple factors including waiting-list size, donor organ factors, and other allocation restrictions (i.e. ABO blood type, presence of anti-HLA antibodies, clinical urgency), which would further impact match probability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.