ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
CINPred: a risk prediction tool for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) is a group of precancerous lesions associated with invasive carcinoma of the cervix that reflects the continuous progression of cervical cancer (CC). Therefore, early detection and standard treatment can effectively prevent the progression of CIN to CC. The objective of this study is to establish machine learning model using clinical data to predict the risk of CIN in women, and to develop a clinical prediction tool, exploring its broader clinical application significance. Methods: Female patients who sought consultation for cervical lesions at a hospital in Jiangsu province between 2018 and 2021 were enrolled in this study. The feature variables considered in the analysis included age, ThinPrep cytological test (TCT), human papillomavirus (HPV) genotype, multiple infection assessment, folate receptor-mediated tumor detection (FRD) and cotton-tipped swab test. Several algorithms were utilized for establishing the model, including adaptive boosting (AdaBoost), gradient boosting decision tree (GBDT), categorical boosting (CatBoost) and others. The performance of models was rigorously evaluated. The SHapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) values were used to identify risk factors affecting the risk of CIN. Results: For predicting CIN events, CatBoost and GBDT had the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) (0.89, 0.87, respectively). AdaBoost had the highest F1 score (F1 score = 0.81), followed by RF, LR and stochastic gradient descent (SGD). SHAP values suggested that the variables affected the risk of CIN in descending order of magnitude were TCT, age, FRD, cotton-tipped swab, multiple infection and HPV, respectively. Discussion: A novel CatBoost-based risk prediction tool for CIN (CINPred) has been developed and it can be accessed through the website at: https://medinfo.hebeu.edu.cn/shiny/CINPred/. CINPred can be used as a quick screening tool to assess CIN risk, offering significant benefits for the development of personalized treatment plans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.