ArticleCanadian geriatrics journal : CGJ2026
Prevalence and Outcomes of Frailty in Older Men-the Manitoba Follow-Up Study.
Article in Canadian geriatrics journal : CGJ, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The Frailty Index (FI) is a measure of frailty with recent guidance on its calculation. Objectives were: 1) To determine the prevalence of frailty and its component domains at different ages in older men; and 2) To determine if the FI, and/or its component scores predict death or long-term care (LTC) admission. Design: A cohort study. Setting: Most of the participants lived in Canada. Subjects: 3,983 men who qualified for air crew training during the Second World War. We included 1,711 men (mean age 76) free of dementia, living in the community, who had data to construct a FI in 1996. Methods: Medical conditions have been measured from 1948. Functional status, health status, and social well-being have been measured by survey since 1996. We constructed a FI from these data and calculated the prevalence of frailty from the age of 75+. We considered three domains of frailty: medical, functional, and psychosocial. We calculated the mortality risk and the risk of LTC care admission using proportional hazards models. Results: Frailty, dementia, and LTC use are all strongly related to age. The FI is associated with mortality and LTC admission at all ages. This effect was a spectrum of risk. The effect of functional domains was seen at all ages, while the effect of medical conditions on these outcomes declined with advancing age. Psychosocial domains were less strongly correlated with these outcomes. Conclusions: The FI is associated with adverse outcomes, and should be considered in clinical and policy decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.