Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41743970›Full record

ArticleCanadian geriatrics journal : CGJ2026

Prevalence and Outcomes of Frailty in Older Men-the Manitoba Follow-Up Study.

Philip D St John, Robert B Tate

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian geriatrics journal : CGJ, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Philip D St JohnSection of Geriatric Medicine, Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg.
Robert B TateCentre on Aging, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The Frailty Index (FI) is a measure of frailty with recent guidance on its calculation. Objectives were: 1) To determine the prevalence of frailty and its component domains at different ages in older men; and 2) To determine if the FI, and/or its component scores predict death or long-term care (LTC) admission. Design: A cohort study. Setting: Most of the participants lived in Canada. Subjects: 3,983 men who qualified for air crew training during the Second World War. We included 1,711 men (mean age 76) free of dementia, living in the community, who had data to construct a FI in 1996. Methods: Medical conditions have been measured from 1948. Functional status, health status, and social well-being have been measured by survey since 1996. We constructed a FI from these data and calculated the prevalence of frailty from the age of 75+. We considered three domains of frailty: medical, functional, and psychosocial. We calculated the mortality risk and the risk of LTC care admission using proportional hazards models. Results: Frailty, dementia, and LTC use are all strongly related to age. The FI is associated with mortality and LTC admission at all ages. This effect was a spectrum of risk. The effect of functional domains was seen at all ages, while the effect of medical conditions on these outcomes declined with advancing age. Psychosocial domains were less strongly correlated with these outcomes. Conclusions: The FI is associated with adverse outcomes, and should be considered in clinical and policy decisions.

Indexed as

cohort studyfrailtyfrailty indexmenprevalence

Identifiers

PMID41743970
PMCPMC12931404

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.