Trial reportHypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979)2026
Intensive BP Control and Cognitive Function: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04030234 (Effects of Intensive Systolic Blood Pressure Lowering Treatment in Reducing RIsk of Vascular evenTs), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Effects of Intensive Systolic Blood Pressure Lowering Treatment in Reducing RIsk of Vascular evenTs (ESPRIT) Study
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Recent developments and challenges in hypertensive dementia over the past year.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe impact of intensive blood pressure (BP) control on cognitive function in East Asian populations remains uncertain. We aimed to assess the effect of a lower systolic BP target on global cognitive function in Chinese hypertensive adults.
methodsThis secondary analysis of a randomized trial involved hypertensive patients with high cardiovascular risk across 116 sites in China. Participants were assigned to receive intensive treatment (systolic BP target <120 mm Hg) or standard treatment (systolic BP target <140 mm Hg) for a median of 3.4 years. Cognitive function was assessed via MMSE (Mini-Mental State Examination) at baseline and the end of the study. Prespecified outcomes were a change in MMSE score and investigator-reported probable dementia.
resultsAmong 11 255 randomized participants, all completed cognitive assessment at baseline and 10 440 (92.8%) at the end of the study. The mean change in MMSE score was not significantly different between arms (difference, 0.05 [95% CI, -0.07 to 0.17]), with a mean change of -0.54 (95% CI, -0.63 to -0.46) in the intensive arm and -0.60 (95% CI, -0.68 to -0.51) in the standard arm. Results were robust across sensitivity analyses and consistent across most subgroups. Exceptions included subgroups of coronary heart disease or antiplatelet treatment. The incidence of probable dementia was too low for meaningful interpretation.
conclusionsIntensive systolic BP lowering to a target of <120 mm Hg for 3 years did not adversely affect global cognitive function in Chinese hypertensive adults, irrespective of age, sex, BP level, and comorbidities, affirming the cognitive safety of this treatment strategy. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04030234.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.