Evidence mapPaperPMID 41744146Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2026

Preconception Perceptions, Knowledge and Behaviours of Women With Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Qualitative Study.

Elana Payne, Danielle Schoenaker, Katrina Turner, Helen R Murphy, Helen Skouteris, Khalida Ismail, Sergio A Silverio, Madeleine Benton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Elana PayneDepartment of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-6214-6641
Danielle SchoenakerSchool of Human Development and Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7652-990X
Katrina TurnerPopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Helen R MurphyNorwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Helen SkouterisSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9959-5750
Khalida IsmailDepartment of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Sergio A SilverioDepartment of Women & Children's Health, School of Life Course & Population Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7177-3471
Madeleine BentonDepartment of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0779-6334

Funding

National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) NIHR304430NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is one of the most common pregnancy complications. While considerable attention has been paid to the management of GDM during pregnancy, women's perceptions of GDM, knowledge of associated risk factors and health behaviours before and between pregnancies are less well understood, despite their importance for informing diabetes prevention programmes. AIMS/

objectivesTo explore women's knowledge of GDM risk factors, perceptions of GDM and preconception health behaviours.

methodsIndividual semi-structured interviews were undertaken with 23 women with GDM in the third trimester of pregnancy. Data were analysed using a template analysis based on preconception knowledge, risk communication, and perceptions and behaviours.

resultsWomen often had limited knowledge of GDM before pregnancy, with many first learning about the condition during antenatal screening. Perceptions of risk were largely weight or BMI centred, with less recognition of other factors. Although participants commonly described intentions to improve diet quality and increase physical activity prior to conception, these intentions were rarely translated into sustained behaviours. Reported barriers included time constraints, caregiving responsibilities, financial costs and limited access to clear, culturally appropriate guidance. Pregnancy preparedness varied by parity: women approaching a first pregnancy focused on general preparation and navigating the healthcare system, whereas women with a prior GDM experience planned around potential recurrence, including early self-management and glucose monitoring.

conclusionsFindings support two priorities: (1) strengthening communication and education at the time of GDM screening and diagnosis so that results and next steps are clear, supportive and person-centred; and (2) providing universal, general preconception support delivered proportionately to need, alongside targeted interconception pathways for women at higher absolute risk, following GDM. The findings do not imply universal GDM-specific preconception education for all women; rather, they indicate a need for needs-based communication during pregnancy and targeted interconception support delivered with clear signposting to resources. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: An advisory group of seven women has been involved in this project. Four online sessions were conducted (between October 2023 and July 2024) to develop the research question, study materials, recruitment plans, interview schedules and participant retention plan.

Indexed as

gestational diabetes mellitushealth behaviourspreconceptionqualitative

Identifiers

PMID41744146
PMCPMC12936987

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.