Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41744225›Full record

ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2026

Towards accurate artificial intelligence models for strain-level phage-host prediction.

Chris J Malajczuk, Andrew Vaitekenas, Joshua J Iszatt, Stephen M Stick, Anthony Kicic, Yuliya V Karpievitch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Chris J MalajczukWal-yan Respiratory Research Centre, The Kids Research Institute  Australia, Western Australia, Perth, 6009, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8865-090X
Andrew VaitekenasWal-yan Respiratory Research Centre, The Kids Research Institute  Australia, Western Australia, Perth, 6009, Australia.
Joshua J IszattWal-yan Respiratory Research Centre, The Kids Research Institute  Australia, Western Australia, Perth, 6009, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6394-5058
Stephen M StickDepartment of Respiratory and Sleep Medicine, Perth Children's Hospital, Western Australia, Perth, 6009, Australia.
Anthony KicicWal-yan Respiratory Research Centre, The Kids Research Institute  Australia, Western Australia, Perth, 6009, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0008-9733
Yuliya V KarpievitchWal-yan Respiratory Research Centre, The Kids Research Institute  Australia, Western Australia, Perth, 6009, Australia.

Funding

Australian Cystic Fibrosis Research TrustCFWA Golf Classic InnovationCure4 Cystic Fibrosis FoundationWA Cystic Fibrosis Collaborative Program 2025 FellowshipWestern Australian Future Health Research & Innovation Fund IC2023-GAIA/21
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Strain-level prediction of phage-host interactions (PHIs) is essential for developing targeted phage therapies. Traditional empirical and homology-based methods often lack the resolution and scalability needed for precision applications. Recently, a new generation of artificial intelligence-driven models has emerged leveraging genomic information to infer PHIs at strain-level resolution. Here, we review recent advances in strain-level PHI prediction, spanning biologically grounded feature-based models, hybrid representation-learning frameworks, phylogeny-agnostic machine learning approaches, and end-to-end deep learning architectures. We examine how these modelling strategies navigate shared structural constraints arising from sparse and imbalanced outcome data, assay-dependent labels, infection complexity, and limited generalization. We further analyse how evaluation design, negative definition, and train-test splitting strategies shape apparent strain-level performance, and why inappropriate benchmarking can inflate claims of biological resolution. Framing these issues in the context of clinical phage therapy, we examine how current strain-level PHI prediction frameworks perform under the biological, experimental, and data constraints characteristic of real-world therapeutic settings. Finally, we outline pragmatic pathways toward more robust, interpretable, and clinically translatable PHI prediction systems.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencebacteriophagephage–host interactionsphage therapypredictive modellingstrain-level prediction

Identifiers

PMID41744225
PMCPMC12936788

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.