ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2026
Escape from X inactivation drives sex differences in gene expression.
Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
X chromosome inactivation (XCI) partially balances gene dosage between sexes; yet, many genes are expressed from the inactive X (Xi) to a variable degree. In this study, we investigate whether variation in Xi expression among genes predicts transcriptional and phenotypic consequences of X-linked variation. We find that Xi expression levels are a strong linear predictor of female-male expression differences, suggesting that other compensatory or regulatory mechanisms play a more minor role in sex differences in X-linked gene expression. Among females, we identify traits-including BMI, estradiol, and testosterone levels-for which higher Xi expression correlates with the strength of evidence for either additive or dominance effects on the trait. We hypothesize that an underappreciated mechanism could generate dominance effects of X-linked variants on a trait-specifically when the variant influences skew in X inactivation. This work establishes Xi expression as important for understanding transcriptional sex differences and physiological variation among females.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.