Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41744366›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of geriatric psychiatry2026

Finding Solutions to Addressing Inequalities in Dementia Diagnosis and Care: Recommendations From a Country-Wide Consultation.

Clarissa Giebel, Marie Poole, Catherine Talbot, Neil Chadborn, Nadia Brookes, Kritika Samsi, Paul Clarkson, Jacqui Cannon, Mark Gabbay, Kerry Hanna and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of geriatric psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Clarissa GiebelDepartment of Primary Care & Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0746-0566
Marie PoolePopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Catherine TalbotDepartment of Psychology, Bournemouth University, Bournemouth, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9353-8990
Neil ChadbornSchool of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1368-7983
Nadia BrookesCentre for Health Services Studies, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.
Kritika SamsiHealth and Social Care Workforce Research Unit, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5961-6086
Paul ClarksonSocial Care and Society, Division of Nursing Midwifery and Social Work, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Jacqui CannonLewy Body Society, Wigan, UK.
Mark GabbayDepartment of Primary Care & Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Kerry HannaSchool of Allied Health Professions and Nursing, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Aravind KomuravelliMersey Care NHS Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Deborah RozanskySocial Care Institute for Excellence, London, UK.
Hilary TetlowNIHR Applied Research Collaboration North West Coast, Liverpool, UK.
Madeleine WalpertDementia UK, London, UK.
Rosie WhittingtonMe2U Centre, Liverpool, UK.
Emma WilliamsDepartment of Primary Care & Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Louise RobinsonPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0209-2503

Funding

Economic and Social Research Council Equadem Network PlusNational Institute for Health and Care Research ARC NWC
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccessing a diagnosis and receiving adequate care and support for dementia can often be subject to various inequalities. Personal-, community-, and infrastructure-level factors can contribute to and often intersect in causing unequal health and care outcomes. With a paucity of evidence to inform solutions for dementia inequalities, the aim of this public consultation exercise was to explore potential solutions to inequalities in dementia diagnosis and care with different dementia stakeholders.

methodsUtilising a future workshop approach, we conducted 11 in-person and remote consultation workshops to discuss experienced barriers of accessing diagnosis and care; discuss an ideal-world scenario where no barriers exist; and solutions to reach more equitable dementia diagnosis and care with people with dementia, unpaid carers, health and social care professionals, and third sector representatives. Discussions were synthesised by the research team and one public consultation group and mapped against the Dementia Inequalities model.

resultsA total of 131 different stakeholders in dementia attended 11 workshops across England. Solutions were identified across three layers of inequalities, with the majority of solutions proposed on a community and infrastructure level. Examples included link workers, a social care career pathway, Community Champions, adequate home equipment, and digital training. Some solutions require Governmental input, such as creating career pathways in the social care workforce, similar to the NHS, to train and maintain good paid carers, as well as a cross-UK national dementia strategy raising the priority of dementia and required changes.

conclusionsDementia inequalities could be addressed via diverse and holistic approaches. With limited evidence to date on the impact of some of the proposed solutions, future research needs to build on these recommendations and design and test suitable interventions.

Identifiers

PMID41744366
PMCPMC12937926

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.