Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41744445›Full record

ArticleJournal of fish biology2026

Does the manipulation of light conditions affect the gut microbiome of Eurasian perch (Perca fluviatilis L.) in a recirculating aquaculture system?

Slawomir Ciesielski, Wiktor Babis, Daniel Żarski, Piotr Gomułka, Piotr Hliwa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of fish biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Slawomir CiesielskiDepartment of Environmental Biotechnology, Faculty of Geoengineering, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Olsztyn, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9084-9782
Wiktor BabisEcology and Genetic Research Unit, Faculty of Science, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-3648-3413
Daniel ŻarskiDepartment of Gamete and Embryo Biology, Institute of Animal Reproduction and Food Research, Polish Academy of Sciences, Olsztyn, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3082-9250
Piotr GomułkaDepartment of Ichthyology and Aquaculture, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Olsztyn, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0098-1131
Piotr HliwaDepartment of Ichthyology and Aquaculture, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Olsztyn, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5205-608X

Funding

Eurasian Maritime and Fisheries Fund 00002-6521.1-OR1400004/17/20
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An important element of modern aquaculture is the creation of optimal environmental conditions for economically profitable fish farming, as only such conditions can guarantee a high growth rate and the welfare of the fish. One of the most important factors is the photoperiod, which has a substantial influence on the circadian rhythm, as it is a direct modulator of physiological functions. It has been reported that the photoperiod affects the microbiome of fish, which could potentially serve as an indicator of their welfare. Therefore, the main aim of this study was to determine the possible effects of shortening and lengthening daylight on the gut microbiome of Eurasian perch (Perca fluviatilis L.) in a recirculating aquaculture system. Our study indicates that rearing the fish in very short daylight for 2 months has no significant effects on their biomass and length; however, long daylight reduced the specific growth rate in comparison to the control group. Furthermore, no significant differences in the structure of the gut microbiome were observed. Importantly, potential differences in the structure of the gut microbiome of fish kept under different light conditions could be masked by the possibility of bacterial transfer between tanks within individual recirculation systems. Nevertheless, discriminant analysis showed that the abundance of Flavobacterium sp. and members of the Microbacteriaceae family was significantly increased in the group of fish reared in the dark for 22 h compared to the control group. Similarly, Pseudopropionibacterium sp. was identified as a significant biomarker between the group of fish reared in the light for 24 h and the control group. These results expand our understanding of the influence of the gut microbiome on the welfare of fish in aquaculture.

Indexed as

AquacultureGastrointestinal MicrobiomeLightPerchesPhotoperiodAnimalsEurasian perchfish welfaregut microbiomeNGSphotoperiod

Identifiers

PMID41744445
PMCPMC13357374

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.