Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41744689›Full record

ReviewBiosensors2026

Progress in Electrochemical and Fluorescence Sensors for Propyl Gallate Monitoring in Food Samples.

Khursheed Ahmad, Sanjeevamuthu Suganthi, Chellakannu Rajkumar, Shanmugam Vignesh, Rohit Kumar Singh Gautam, Tae Hwan Oh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biosensors, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Khursheed AhmadSchool of Chemical Engineering, Yeungnam University, 280 Daehak-Ro, Gyeongsan 38541, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-8603-3572
Sanjeevamuthu SuganthiSchool of Chemical Engineering, Yeungnam University, 280 Daehak-Ro, Gyeongsan 38541, Republic of Korea.
Chellakannu RajkumarSchool of Chemical Engineering, Yeungnam University, 280 Daehak-Ro, Gyeongsan 38541, Republic of Korea.
Shanmugam VigneshSchool of Chemical Engineering, Yeungnam University, 280 Daehak-Ro, Gyeongsan 38541, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-8323-3229
Rohit Kumar Singh GautamDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Teerthanker Mahaveer University, Moradabad 244001, India.
Tae Hwan OhSchool of Chemical Engineering, Yeungnam University, 280 Daehak-Ro, Gyeongsan 38541, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-4922-5000

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent years have witnessed significant growth in the development of propyl gallate (PG) sensors. PG can be monitored by various approaches, such as electrochemical and fluorescence methods. The electrochemical approaches have several advantages, such as low cost, a benign fabrication process, and high sensitivity and selectivity. Similarly, the fluorescence method has its own advantages, including low cost, high sensitivity, and fast response. Both methods are promising approaches for the monitoring of PG compared to chromatographic methods. In this mini-review article, we review the progress in the preparation of materials for the determination of PG using electrochemical and fluorescence methods. The fabrication of electrodes and the working principle for PG detection are illustrated. The challenges and future perspectives for PG detection are discussed.

Indexed as

antioxidantselectrochemical sensorsfluorescencefood additivepropyl gallate

Identifiers

PMID41744689
PMCPMC12938649

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.