ReviewBiosensors2026
Label-Free Electrochemical Biosensors: An Updated Perspective Focused on Genosensing, Multiplexing, and Commercial Potential.
Review in Biosensors, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Portable Sensing Systems in Biological and Chemical Analyses: A Review of Sensor Technologies, Miniaturized Platforms, Data Processing, and Field Applications.Micromachines · 2026Review
- Magnetic Beads-Based Electrochemical Label-Free DNA-Bioassay for the Detection of Peanut Allergen Ara h2 in Food Matrices.Biosensors · 2026Article
- Engineering graphene oxide interfaces for electrochemical biosensing of biomolecules, cells, and organoids.Nano convergence · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The increasing impact of infectious, cardiovascular and neurodegenerative diseases has intensified the demand for early and decentralized diagnostics. Label-free electrochemical biosensors are promising candidates, offering high sensitivity, low reagent consumption and miniaturizable, low-cost architectures for point-of-care (PoC) testing. This review summarizes advances in immobilization strategies, recognition elements such as DNA, antibodies, aptamers, and molecularly imprinted polymers, as well as electrode platforms including glassy carbon, screen-printed, and 3D-printed systems, with an emphasis on DNA biosensors, multiplexed configurations, and applications to disease biomarkers. Beyond analytical performance, we critically examine the barriers that keep most devices at the proof-of-concept stage, including bioreceptor stability and immobilization, limited validation in real samples, reliance on conventional materials, challenges in scalable manufacturing, transport, and storage, and the absence of fully integrated PoC systems. Finally, we discuss significant advances in sensitivity, reproducibility, and application to real samples, but note that translation to real-world use and commercialization remains limited.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.