ReviewCells2026
Ancient and Emerging Nanostructures for Innovations to Fight Head and Neck Cancer.
Review in Cells, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Nanomedicine Strategy: Spatiotemporally Programmed Delivery of Engineered Exosomes via Smart Scaffolds for Craniofacial Bone Regeneration.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) remains a major global health challenge due to its aggressive behavior, late-stage diagnosis, and high incidence of therapy resistance. At the cellular level, these clinical limitations are driven by profound alterations in oncogenic signaling, stress adaptation, DNA damage response pathways, and immune regulation within the tumor microenvironment. Advances in nanotechnology offer powerful opportunities to address these challenges by enabling targeted interference with cellular processes that govern tumor growth, survival, and therapy resistance. "Ancient" (i.e., established, long-studied) nanostructures, including mineral-based nanoparticles, natural biopolymers, and plant-derived nanovesicles, provide inherently biocompatible and bioactive platforms capable of modulating cellular signaling, redox balance, and immune responses. In parallel, emerging nanosystems-such as nanobodies, engineered exosomes, DNA origami, and stimuli-responsive smart nanoparticles-allow precise molecular targeting, controlled cargo release, and direct manipulation of intracellular pathways and intercellular communication. This manuscript synthesizes historical and contemporary developments in nanostructure design, highlighting how the integration of ancient materials with advanced nanotechnology can reshape therapeutic strategies for HNSCC. By targeting key cellular and microenvironmental processes, including DNA damage response signaling, redox homeostasis, immune regulation and stress-adaptive survival mechanisms, rather than drug delivery alone, these integrated nano-platforms offer promising avenues to overcome resistance mechanisms, reprogram the tumor microenvironment, and improve therapeutic precision and patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.