ReviewCells2026
Targeting Glycolytic Metabolism in Cancer Therapy: Current Approaches and Future Perspectives.
Review in Cells, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Review
- Targeting the Warburg Effect in Anaplastic Thyroid Carcinoma: Metabolic Vulnerabilities and Therapeutic Opportunities.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Review
- Circulating Protein-Mediated Pathways in Basal Cell Carcinoma: Mendelian Randomization Reveals STAT3 and GUCA1A as Key Regulatory Hubs.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2026Article
- Cell competition within breast tumor microenvironment: emerging role of cancer stem cells and immune cells in tumor progression and therapeutic implications.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Aerobic glycolysis in bladder cancer: research advances and targeted therapy potential.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Elucidating the Nexus of Mitochondrial Dysfunction and Oncometabolite Accumulation in Tumorigenesis.Nigerian medical journal : journal of the Nigeria Medical AssociationReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Targeting the Warburg effect (aerobic glycolysis) in tumor cells represents a promising metabolic therapeutic strategy in cancer research. This review analyzes the regulatory mechanisms and therapeutic potential of key glycolysis pathway components, including glucose transporters (GLUTs) and glycolytic enzymes such as hexokinase 2 (HK2), phosphofructokinase (PFK), glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), pyruvate kinase M2 (PKM2), and lactate dehydrogenase A (LDHA). We evaluate the molecular mechanisms of various inhibitors and the current clinical development landscape, noting that limitations of monotherapy stem not only from tumor metabolic plasticity but also largely from the unacceptable toxicity of many inhibitors due to the essential role of glycolysis in normal cell metabolism. Furthermore, we explore the molecular basis of synergistic interactions between glycolysis inhibitors and chemotherapy, radiotherapy, immunotherapy, photothermal therapy, and targeted therapy, proposing that rational combination strategies may help overcome resistance and improve therapeutic efficacy. Finally, the review outlines future challenges and directions, emphasizing that the primary obstacle in metabolic treatments is achieving selective inhibition of glycolytic enzymes in cancer cells while sparing normal cells. To address this challenge, the development of high-selectivity agents, cancer-specific nanodelivery systems, precise biomarker identification, and innovative combination regimens based on metabolic-immune regulation is crucial for advancing glycolysis-targeted therapy toward clinical translation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.