ArticleJournal of Intelligence2026
Applying Multiple Machine Learning Models to Classify Mild Cognitive Impairment from Speech in Community-Dwelling Older Adults.
Article in Journal of Intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aims to develop effective screening tools for cognitive impairment by integrating optimised speech classification features with various machine learning models. A total of 65 patients diagnosed with early-stage Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) and 55 healthy controls (HCs) were included. Audio data were collected through a picture description task and processed using the Python-based Librosa library for speech feature extraction. Three machine learning models were constructed: the Random Forest (RF) and Support Vector Machine (SVM) models utilised speech classification features optimised via the Sequential Forward Selection (SFS) algorithm, while the Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) model was trained on preprocessed speech data. After parameter tuning, the Librosa library successfully extracted 41 speech classification features from all participants. The application of the SFS optimisation strategy and the use of preprocessed data significantly improved identification accuracy. The SVM model achieved an accuracy of 0.825 (AUC: 0.91), the RF model reached 0.88 (AUC: 0.86), and the XGBoost model attained 0.92 (AUC: 0.91). These results suggest that speech-based machine learning models markedly improve the accuracy of distinguishing MCI patients from healthy older adults, providing reliable support for early cognitive deficit identification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.