Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41745247›Full record

ReviewJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Biomarkers in Invasive Pulmonary Fungal Infections: Where Do We Stand?

Isabel Montesinos, Hector Rodriguez-Villalobos

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Isabel MontesinosMicrobiology Department, Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, 1200 Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-1956-5330
Hector Rodriguez-VillalobosMicrobiology Department, Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, 1200 Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-3041-1591

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Invasive pulmonary fungal infections remain a major cause of morbidity and mortality among immunocompromised and critically ill patients. Rapid and accurate diagnosis is crucial for improving outcomes, yet conventional methods such as culture and histopathology suffer from limited sensitivity and slow turnaround times. Recently, significant progress has been made in the development and standardization of serological and molecular biomarkers that enhance the early detection of the key pulmonary fungal diseases, particularly invasive pulmonary aspergillosis and pneumocystosis. Diagnostic tools for mucormycosis, however, remain scarce. PCR tools have strong potential to significantly improve early detection, but they are not yet widely implemented, and standardized commercial assays remain limited. Accessible antigen-based tests with robust performance are highly anticipated and expected to become available soon. This review summarizes the current evidence regarding the optimal use of galactomannan, β-D-glucan and PCR-based assays, emphasizing how their performance varies according to the pathogen, the type of specimen and the host population. Specific challenges, such as differentiating colonization from infection in non-HIV

Indexed as

biomarkersinvasive pulmonary aspergillosisinvasive pulmonary fungal infectionInvasive pulmonary mucormycosisnew diagnostic toolspneumocystosis

Identifiers

PMID41745247
PMCPMC12941458

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.