Clinical Application of Inhaled Nitric Oxide in Conditions of Excessive Right Heart Load: A Review from Neonatal Pulmonary Hypertension to Perioperative Cardiac Surgery Management.

Excessive right heart load imposes an acute or chronic injury on the right ventricle (RV), predisposing critically ill neonates and cardiac surgical patients to RV failure, low cardiac output syndrome, and death. Inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) is a selective pulmonary vasodilator that improves ventilation-perfusion matching and unloads the RV without systemic hypotension; nonetheless, its application beyond established neonatal indications remains contentious. Our review synthesizes current mechanistic, translational, and clinical evidence regarding iNO use in three major settings characterized by excessive RV load: (1) neonatal pulmonary hypertension, particularly PPHN; (2) acute and chronic RV overload in older children and adults, including secondary pulmonary hypertension, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and acute pulmonary embolism; and (3) perioperative and post-cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) management in congenital and adult cardiac surgery. In term and near-term infants with hypoxic respiratory failure, pivotal randomized trials show that iNO consistently improves oxygenation and reduces extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) use, but this has little effect on survival and long-term neurodevelopment. In ARDS and other adult critical-care indications, iNO provides transient improvements in gas exchange and RV performance without reducing mortality or ventilator duration, and meta-analyses signal an increased risk of acute kidney injury, particularly with prolonged use. In contrast, perioperative studies around CPB demonstrate that prophylactic postoperative iNO and intra-CPB nitric oxide administration can attenuate pulmonary hypertensive crises, facilitate separation from CPB, shorten ventilation and intensive care stay, and, in selected high-risk cohorts, may reduce cardiac surgery-associated acute kidney injury, although survival benefits remain unproven. Across these scenarios, iNO should be used judiciously and in a pathophysiology-driven manner as a time-limited, targeted adjunct to stabilize patients with documented or anticipated RV strain rather than a disease-modifying therapy. Future work should refine patient selection, timing, dosing, and weaning strategies, and define the long-term safety and cost-effectiveness of iNO within contemporary multimodal RV support pathways.