ArticleJournal of imaging2026
Use of Patient-Specific 3D Models in Paediatric Surgery: Effect on Communication and Surgical Management.
Article in Journal of imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Children with rare tumours and malformations may benefit from innovative imaging, including patient-specific 3D models that can enhance communication and surgical planning. The primary aim was to evaluate the impact of patient-specific 3D models on communication with families. The secondary aims were to assess their influence on medical management and to establish an efficient post-processing workflow. From 2021 to 2024, we prospectively included patients aged 3 months to 18 years with rare tumours or malformations. Families completed questionnaires before and after the presentation of a 3D model generated from MRI sequences, including peripheral nerve tractography. Treating physicians completed a separate questionnaire before surgical planning. Analyses were performed in R. Among 21 patients, diagnoses included 11 tumours, 8 malformations, 1 trauma, and 1 pancreatic pseudo-cyst. Likert scale responses showed improved family understanding after viewing the 3D model (mean score 3.94 to 4.67) and a high overall evaluation (mean 4.61). Physicians also rated the models positively. An efficient image post-processing workflow was defined. Although manual 3D reconstruction remains time-consuming, these preliminary results show that colourful, patient-specific 3D models substantially improve family communication and support clinical decision-making. They also highlight the need for supporting the development of MRI-based automated segmentation softwares using deep neural networks, which are clinically approved and usable in routine practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.