Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41745797›Full record

ArticleToxics2026

Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) in the Rusizi River System, Burundi: A Multi-Compartment Assessment from Tributaries to Lake Tanganyika.

Thimo Groffen, Giulia Lodi, Joël Ndayishimiye, Simon Buhungu, Léopold Nduwimana, Lambert Niyoyitungiye, Jonas Schoelynck

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Toxics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Thimo GroffenECOSPHERE, Department of Biology, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1C, B2610 Wilrijk, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-3094-9300
Giulia LodiECOSPHERE, Department of Biology, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1C, B2610 Wilrijk, Belgium.ORCID 0009-0001-0570-7748
Joël NdayishimiyeLaboratory of Biodiversity, Ecology and Environment, Research Center for Natural and Environmental Sciences, Department of Biology, University of Burundi, Avenue de l'UNESCO 2, Bujumbura P.O. Box 1550, Burundi.
Simon BuhunguLaboratory of Biodiversity, Ecology and Environment, Research Center for Natural and Environmental Sciences, Department of Biology, University of Burundi, Avenue de l'UNESCO 2, Bujumbura P.O. Box 1550, Burundi.
Léopold NduwimanaLaboratory of Biodiversity, Ecology and Environment, Research Center for Natural and Environmental Sciences, Department of Biology, University of Burundi, Avenue de l'UNESCO 2, Bujumbura P.O. Box 1550, Burundi.
Lambert NiyoyitungiyeLaboratory of Biodiversity, Ecology and Environment, Research Center for Natural and Environmental Sciences, Department of Biology, University of Burundi, Avenue de l'UNESCO 2, Bujumbura P.O. Box 1550, Burundi.
Jonas SchoelynckECOSPHERE, Department of Biology, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1C, B2610 Wilrijk, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-0166-280X

Funding

Research Foundation - Flanders 1109925NResearch Foundation - Flanders 1205724NResearch Foundation - Flanders W001522NVLIR-UOS RUBICOM
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are global pollutants, yet data from tropical freshwater ecosystems remain scarce. This study provides the first assessment of PFAS occurrence in the Rusizi delta (Burundi), from tributaries to Lake Tanganyika, by analyzing water, sediment, macrophytes, and fish, and by evaluating human health risks from fish consumption. In water, only PFOA (<0.60-7.80 ng/L) was detected and showed a uniform spatial distribution. Sediment concentrations were largely below quantification limits, likely reflecting unfavorable sorption conditions. Macrophytes were dominated by short-chain PFAS, particularly PFBS, without consistent species- or site-specific patterns, supporting their potential as biomonitors of cumulative PFAS exposure. Fish exhibited the highest PFAS diversity, with more diverse profiles in liver than muscle, although tissue-specific patterns were often absent. PFBS was dominant across fish species, and emerging PFAS (e.g., PFBS and NaDONA) were frequently detected. Human health risks from fish consumption were, except for children, mostly below EFSA tolerable weekly intake values for regulated PFAS, but potential concern for adolescents and adults emerged when PFAS were expressed as PFOA equivalents. This study provides essential baseline data for tropical freshwater systems and highlights the need for expanded PFAS monitoring and risk assessment in data-poor regions.

Indexed as

bioaccumulationfishhuman health risk assessmentplantspollution

Identifiers

PMID41745797
PMCPMC12945145

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.