ReviewVeterinary sciences2026
Artificial Intelligence in Veterinary Education: Preparing the Workforce for Clinical Applications in Diagnostics and Animal Health.
Review in Veterinary sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence, epistemic authority, and emerging risks in veterinary clinical decision-making.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI), including machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL), is rapidly transforming clinical veterinary practice by enhancing diagnostics, disease surveillance and decision support processes across animal health domains. The safe and effective clinical deployment of these technologies, however, depends critically on the preparedness of the veterinary workforce, positioning veterinary education as a strategic enabler of translational adoption. This narrative review examines the integration of AI within veterinary education as a foundational step toward its responsible application in clinical practice. We synthesize current evidence on AI-driven tools relevant to veterinary curricula, including generative and multimodal large language models, intelligent tutoring systems, virtual and augmented reality platforms and AI-based decision support tools applied to imaging, epidemiology, parasitology, food safety and animal health. Particular attention is given to how the structured educational use of AI mirrors real-world clinical workflows and supports the development of competencies essential for clinical translation, such as data interpretation, uncertainty management, ethical reasoning and professional accountability. The review further addresses ethical, regulatory and cognitive considerations associated with AI adoption, including algorithmic bias, data privacy, equity of access and the risks of overreliance, emphasizing their direct implications for diagnostic reliability and animal welfare. By framing veterinary education as a controlled and reflective environment for AI engagement, this article highlights how pedagogically grounded training can facilitate safer clinical deployment, foster interdisciplinary collaboration and align technological innovation with professional standards in veterinary medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.