Evidence mapPaperPMID 41746010Full record

ArticleTropical medicine and infectious disease2026

AI-Assisted Differentiation of Dengue and Chikungunya Using Big, Imbalanced Epidemiological Data.

Thanh Huy Nguyen, Nguyen Quoc Khanh Le

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tropical medicine and infectious disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Thanh Huy NguyenInternational Ph.D. Program in Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110301, Taiwan.ORCID 0009-0000-8556-4347
Nguyen Quoc Khanh LeIn-Service Master Program in Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110301, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-4896-7926

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dengue and chikungunya are endemic arboviral diseases in many low- and middle-income countries, often co-circulating and presenting with overlapping symptoms that hinder early diagnosis. Timely differentiation is critical, especially in resource-limited settings where laboratory testing is unavailable. We developed and evaluated machine-learning (ML)- and deep-learning (DL) models to classify dengue, chikungunya, and discarded cases using a large-scale, real-world dataset of over 6.7 million entries from Brazil (2013-2020). After applying the Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE) to address class imbalance, we trained six ML models and one artificial neural network (ANN) using only demographic, clinical, and comorbidity features. The Random Forest model achieved strong multi-class classification performance (Recall: 0.9288, the Area Under the Curve (AUC): 0.9865). The ANN model excelled in identifying chikungunya cases (Recall: 0.9986, AUC: 0.9283), suggesting its suitability for rapid screening. External validation confirmed the generalizability of our models, particularly for distinguishing discarded cases. Our models demonstrate high-accuracy in differentiating dengue and chikungunya using routinely collected clinical and epidemiological data. This work supports the development of Artificial Intelligence-powered decision-support tools to assist frontline healthcare workers in under-resourced settings and aligns with the One Health approach to improving surveillance and diagnosis of neglected tropical diseases.

Indexed as

arboviral infectionschikungunyadeep learningdenguediagnosisimbalanced datamachine learningneglected tropical diseasespublic health surveillance

Identifiers

PMID41746010
PMCPMC12944897

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.