Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41746106›Full record

ArticleVaccines2026

Comparative Evaluation of Mucosal Adjuvants for Intranasal Immunization with a Recombinant RSV Prefusion F Protein.

Hongqiao Hu, Lei Cao, Jie Jiang, Yuqing Shi, Liang Du, Mengxuan Chu, Hai Li, Yan Zhang

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Hongqiao HuNational Key Laboratory of Intelligent Tracking and Forecasting for Infectious Diseases, NHC Key Laboratory of Medical Virology and Viral Disease, National Institute for Viral Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 102206, China.
Lei CaoNational Key Laboratory of Intelligent Tracking and Forecasting for Infectious Diseases, NHC Key Laboratory of Medical Virology and Viral Disease, National Institute for Viral Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 102206, China.
Jie JiangNational Key Laboratory of Intelligent Tracking and Forecasting for Infectious Diseases, NHC Key Laboratory of Medical Virology and Viral Disease, National Institute for Viral Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 102206, China.
Yuqing ShiNational Key Laboratory of Intelligent Tracking and Forecasting for Infectious Diseases, NHC Key Laboratory of Medical Virology and Viral Disease, National Institute for Viral Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 102206, China.
Liang DuNational Key Laboratory of Intelligent Tracking and Forecasting for Infectious Diseases, NHC Key Laboratory of Medical Virology and Viral Disease, National Institute for Viral Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 102206, China.
Mengxuan ChuNational Key Laboratory of Intelligent Tracking and Forecasting for Infectious Diseases, NHC Key Laboratory of Medical Virology and Viral Disease, National Institute for Viral Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 102206, China.
Hai LiNational Key Laboratory of Intelligent Tracking and Forecasting for Infectious Diseases, NHC Key Laboratory of Medical Virology and Viral Disease, National Institute for Viral Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 102206, China.
Yan ZhangNational Key Laboratory of Intelligent Tracking and Forecasting for Infectious Diseases, NHC Key Laboratory of Medical Virology and Viral Disease, National Institute for Viral Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 102206, China.

Funding

Beijing Natural Science Foundation and Haidian Original Innovation Joint Fund L222122Monitoring, prediction, and early-warning technologies for unknown and emerging pathogens ZDGWNLJS26-27
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRespiratory syncytial virus (RSV) remains a major etiologic agent of acute lower respiratory tract infection (ALRTI). Currently licensed RSV vaccines are administered by intramuscular injection and induce limited immunity at the respiratory mucosal interface, underscoring the need for effective mucosal vaccination strategies.

methodsTo enhance mucosal immune responses, we used prefusion F protein (Pre-F) as the antigen and performed intranasal immunization in BALB/c mice. Four mucosal adjuvants (CpG-ODN, CTA1-DD, IFN-α, and PEI) were systematically compared across different dose levels to evaluate their immunological and protective efficacy.

resultsBoth adjuvant type and dose helped shape the magnitude and quality of the immune response and the level of protection. CpG-ODN showed a dose-restricted immunopotentiating effect: an intermediate dose (10 µg) significantly increased neutralizing antibody titers and nasal mucosal IgA responses, improved post-challenge body weight recovery, and reduced lung viral load, whereas higher doses provided no additional benefit and were associated with aggravated lung pathology. PEI and IFN-α exhibited dose-dependency within a certain range, but increasing doses did not result in further improvements in immune responses or protection; an intermediate dose (10 µg) was sufficient to elicit robust systemic and mucosal immunity. CTA1-DD improved selected immune parameters at appropriate doses, yet its overall immunopotentiating effects remained modest. Direct comparative analysis using the representative doses selected from the three dose levels for each adjuvant indicated that 10 µg CpG-ODN or PEI provided superior immunogenicity and protection, whereas PEI induced a Th2-biased immune profile at both humoral and cellular levels.

conclusionsThese findings highlight that favorable immunogenicity and protection are achieved within defined dose windows rather than at maximal doses. Among the adjuvants studied, low-to-intermediate doses of CpG-ODN, particularly 10 µg, show strong potential for intranasal mucosal immunization with recombinant RSV Pre-F protein. By systematically comparing dose-effect profiles across multiple mucosal adjuvants, this study offers comparative insights into adjuvant selection and dose selection for intranasal RSV vaccine development.

Indexed as

CpG-ODNCTA1-DDmucosal adjuvantPEIrespiratory syncytial virus (RSV)type I interferon

Identifiers

PMID41746106
PMCPMC12945138

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.