ArticlePsychological research2026
Sex based differences in time processing were found in newly developed tasks.
Article in Psychological research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Role of Physical Activity on Spatial and Temporal Cognitive Processing in Young Women.Brain sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Time perception remains a complex and elusive cognitive process. While traditional assessment methods often rely on time comparison between stimuli durations or reproduction of a given interval, this study sought to address several unanswered questions when considered together. Specifically, we investigated how time is processed differently below and above one second intervals, the impact of faster and slower comparison stimuli on judgments, and the potential influence of stimuli motion in performance. To address these issues, we developed novel time comparison and reproduction computerized tasks, comparing them to an already validated motion-based time comparison procedure. In addition, we explored sex differences in time perception, which appear to be present in the literature but unclear in scope. Therefore, 42 healthy volunteer psychology students (20 men and 22 women) participated in this study, assessed with all three time tasks. Our findings revealed a male advantage in both time comparison and reproduction, characterized by greater accuracy and faster response times. We also observed differences in performance based on faster and slower stimuli, and between stimuli above and below 1 s duration. These results contrast with those of the validated motion-based task, underscoring the importance of controlling the design aspects. Our findings deepen the understanding of time perception, offering researchers new investigative tools that overcome previous design limitations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41746407What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.