ArticleDiscover oncology2026
Molecular and AI enabled prognostication in endometrial cancer a 2015 to 2024 bibliometric Atlas and critical review.
Article in Discover oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEndometrial cancer (EC) is a leading gynecologic malignancy with increasing incidence and mortality, particularly in high-income countries. Traditional prognostic models based on clinicopathological features often fail to accurately stratify risk, especially in early-stage and low-risk cases.
methodsA bibliometric analysis was performed on research articles published between 2015 and 2024, sourced from the Web of Science and Scopus databases. The analysis included publications on prognostic or risk models in EC and assessed key trends and themes within the field.
resultsThe study reveals a significant shift toward molecular-based stratification, particularly with the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) subtypes, and the incorporation of AI-driven models. Molecular markers, such as POLE-ultramutated and p53-abnormal tumors, alongside biomarkers like HE4 and L1CAM, offer improved prognostic accuracy. AI models, including radiomics and deep learning approaches, show promise in predicting disease recurrence and patient outcomes.
conclusionAdvances in molecular classification and AI have improved EC prognostication. However, challenges remain in prospective validation and broader clinical implementation. Future research should focus on multi-omics integration and international collaboration to improve the accuracy and applicability of EC prognostic models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.