Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41746908›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Irritancy and spatial repellency efficacy of repellent-treated fabrics against Aedes aegypti (L.) (Diptera: Culicidae) in an excito-repellency system.

Alex Ahebwa, Jeffrey Hii, Theerachart Leepasert, Jirod Nararak, Monthathip Kongmee, Theeraphap Chareonviriyaphap

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alex AhebwaDepartment of Entomology, Faculty of Agriculture, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Jeffrey HiiDepartment of Entomology, Faculty of Agriculture, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Theerachart LeepasertDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Jirod NararakDepartment of Entomology, Faculty of Agriculture, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Monthathip KongmeeDepartment of Entomology, Faculty of Agriculture, Kasetsart University, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand.
Theeraphap ChareonviriyaphapDepartment of Entomology, Faculty of Agriculture, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7362-5621

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mosquito-borne diseases remain a major public health challenge, driving the need for affordable and scalable vector control tools. In this study, an excito-repellency system was used to evaluate the contact irritancy and spatial repellency potential of two low-cost repellent-treated fabrics consisting of Calico (100% cotton) and Jute (hessian), and a standard treated bed net polyester (BNP), against a laboratory strain of Aedes aegypti (L.). Fabric swatches (15 x 17.5 cm) were treated with six concentrations of transfluthrin and metofluthrin, and five of permethrin. Behavioral responses were measured via chamber escape over 30 minutes using 60 unfed female mosquitoes per treatment. Chemical retention was assessed using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). Calico elicited the highest mosquito escape (Odds ratio, OR = 3.12) followed by Jute (OR = 1.74) relative to BNP. Transfluthrin (OR = 5.45) produced the highest escape among insecticides, whereas low dose treatments resulted in more escape (OR = 1.23) than high dose applications. Non-contact chambers elicited more escape (OR = 1.87) than the contact chambers, indicating stronger spatial repellency than contact irritancy. Toxicity was most pronounced with metofluthrin across fabrics (Mortality: OR = 32.27), particulary on BNP which corresponded with reduced escape. GC-MS results showed stable permethrin retention across fabrics, whereas transfluthrin retention varied significantly between Calico and BNP after 24 h drying. These findings highlight the importance of fabric-insecticide compatibility and the influence of exposure method, dose, and chemical volatility on repellent efficacy. Future studies could investigate chemical interactions between repellents and fabrics to clarify their combined effects.

Indexed as

AedesInsect RepellentsMosquito ControlTextilesAnimalsCyclopropanesFemaleFluorobenzenesPermethrin(2,3,5,6-tetrafluoro-4-methoxymethylphenyl)methyl-2,2-dimethyl-3-(1-propenyl)cyclopropanecarboxylateCyclopropanesFluorobenzenesInsect RepellentsPermethrintransfluthrin

Identifiers

PMID41746908
PMCPMC12944692

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.