Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41746917›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Response of mid-lactation primiparous Holstein cows to the supplementation of rumen-protected methionine during the summer.

Caio R Monteiro, Victor Augusto de Oliveira, Rabeche Schmith, João Pedro A Rezende, Tales L Resende, João A Negrão, Marina A C Danés

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Caio R MonteiroDepartment of Animal Science, Federal University of Lavras, Lavras, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-8164-4927
Victor Augusto de OliveiraDepartment of Animal Science, Federal University of Lavras, Lavras, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Rabeche SchmithDepartment of Animal Science, Federal University of Lavras, Lavras, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
João Pedro A RezendeDepartment of Animal Science, Federal University of Lavras, Lavras, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Tales L ResendeEvonik Brasil Ltda., São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
João A NegrãoDepartment of Basic Sciences, Faculty of Animal Science and Food Engineering (FZEA), University of São Paulo (USP), Pirassununga, São Paulo, Brazil.
Marina A C DanésDepartment of Animal Science, Federal University of Lavras, Lavras, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4196-8328

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the effects of rumen-protected methionine (RPM) supplementation on productive and physiological responses of primiparous Holstein cows during summer. We hypothesized that RPM supplementation would maintain or improve milk yield and composition due to beneficial physiological, redox, and inflammatory responses in cows exposed to summer heat. The trial was conducted in a randomized block design during nine weeks in Brazil using 80 primiparous cows (182 ± 64 DIM; 42.9 ± 4.7 kg/d milk). Cows were blocked by milk yield and DIM and assigned to a control diet (CON; no added RPM) or the same diet supplemented with RPM (Mepron®, Evonik) at 0.75 g/kg diet dry matter, targeting 20 g/cow/day (product contains 62% metabolizable methionine) to the average cow. Milk yield and composition, vaginal temperature, respiratory rate, and plasma samples were collected in weeks 3, 6, and 9. Data were analyzed using mixed models including treatment, week, and their interaction as fixed effects, and block and cow as random effects. Cows were maintained under naturally occurring summer conditions. Environmental monitoring during weeks 3, 6, and 9 indicated elevated temperature-humidity index (THI) values, with values remaining above the heat-stress threshold (THI > 68) for 68.3% of the monitored hours (mean THI = 70.6; range 61.0-84.4). Overall (least squares mean across weeks 3, 6, and 9), RPM increased milk yield by 2.0 kg/d (44.9 vs. 42.9 kg/d), protein yield by 50 g/d (1,464 vs. 1,414 g/d), lactose yield by 108 g/d (2,109 vs. 2,001 g/d), and total solids yield by 176 g/d (5,331 vs. 5,155 g/d). Lactose concentration was lower in RPM (4.71 vs. 4.76%). Fat yield was unaffected, but a treatment × week interaction was observed for fat content. Milk fatty acid (FA) profile was unchanged, although treatment × week interactions were observed for individual fatty acids (C16:0, C18:0, C18:1, and preformed FA). Plasma glucose was lower, and insulin was higher in RPM than in CON cows (39.3 vs. 43.2 mg/dL and 0.52 vs. 0.35 ng/mL, respectively). Antioxidant capacity improved, with RPM cows having greater ferric reducing antioxidant power (32.9 vs. 28.5 µM) and lower malondialdehyde (2.48 vs. 2.78 nmol/mL). Other biochemical, inflammatory, and immune markers were unaffected. Respiratory rate was slightly higher in RPM than in CON cows (55 vs. 50 breaths/min). Mean vaginal temperature did not differ between treatments; however, a treatment × time × hour interaction was observed. Supplementation with RPM improved milk and solids yield, and enhanced antioxidant capacity and insulin levels, supporting its use to improve metabolic resilience under warm conditions.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsLactationMethionineRumenAnimal FeedAnimalsBrazilCattleFemaleMilkParitySeasonsMethionine

Identifiers

PMID41746917
PMCPMC12944771

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.