Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41747197›Full record

ArticleBlood advances2026

Real-world outcomes and toxicities of CAR-T in relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma: a multicenter cohort study.

John Sharp, Paolo Strati, Subodh Bhatta, Jennifer J Huang, Colin Thomas, Omar Elghawy, Daniel Reef, Alexander Gorzewski, John Wang, Geoffrey Shouse and 19 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Blood advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

29 authors.

John SharpArthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.ORCID 0000-0001-5765-8549
Paolo StratiMD Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Houston, TX.ORCID 0000-0002-7445-1459
Subodh BhattaArthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
Jennifer J HuangFred Hutchinson Cancer Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.ORCID 0000-0003-0863-9389
Colin ThomasAbramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Omar ElghawyAbramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.ORCID 0000-0002-0786-8035
Daniel ReefLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.ORCID 0000-0003-2804-0584
Alexander GorzewskiLurie Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL.ORCID 0000-0002-0657-1328
John WangFeinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL.
Geoffrey ShouseCity of Hope Cancer Center, Duarte, CA.ORCID 0000-0002-7917-5713
Catherine ReinertAnschutz Cancer Center, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO.
Andinet TeferraMasonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
Esteban Toro VelezMassey Comprehensive Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA.ORCID 0000-0001-8147-4504
Ari PelcovitsBrown University Health Cancer Institute, Brown University, Providence, RI.
Thomas OllilaBrown University Health Cancer Institute, Brown University, Providence, RI.ORCID 0000-0003-0102-6491
William ClarkMassey Comprehensive Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA.
Victor YazbeckMassey Comprehensive Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA.
Joseph MaakaronMasonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
Manali KamdarAnschutz Cancer Center, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO.ORCID 0000-0002-1930-152X
Lindsey FitzgeraldHuntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.
Alexey DanilovCity of Hope Cancer Center, Duarte, CA.
Reem KarmaliLurie Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL.
Natalie S GroverLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.ORCID 0000-0002-1346-3157
Stefan K BartaAbramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.ORCID 0000-0002-3280-5271
Timothy J VoorheesArthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.ORCID 0000-0001-7603-6454
Andy I ChenKnight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, OR.ORCID 0000-0001-5204-9445
Mazyar ShadmanFred Hutchinson Cancer Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.ORCID 0000-0002-3365-6562
Sairah AhmedMD Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Houston, TX.ORCID 0000-0001-7302-8299
Narendranath EpperlaArthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.ORCID 0000-0002-8216-3457

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

abstractChimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy has revolutionized the treatment of relapsed/refractory (R/R) follicular lymphoma (FL). Real-world efficacy and toxicity data are needed because clinical trial populations are often unrepresentative. Therefore, we conducted a multicenter retrospective study of R/R FL patients undergoing commercial axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) or tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel) between 2021 and 2024. End points included efficacy measures (overall response rate [ORR], complete response rate [CRR], progression-free survival [PFS], and overall survival [OS]) and toxicity (rates of cytokine release syndrome [CRS] and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome [ICANS]). Among 136 patients, 100 (74%) received axi-cel and 36 (26%) received tisa-cel. Axi-cel patients were younger than tisa-cel patients (median age, 60 vs 68 years; P = .001) and received bendamustine lymphodepletion less often than them (9% vs 33%; P< .001). Median follow-up was 14.4 months (range, 0.8-72.0 months). In the unweighted analysis, compared with tisa-cel, axi-cel was associated with higher ORR (96% vs 80%; P = .007), CRR (88% vs 71%; P = .024), and longer median PFS (30.5 months vs 11.9 months; P = .021). Median OS did not differ significantly between the 2 products (not reached vs 23.6 months; P = .061). The rates of CRS were comparable (75% vs 75%; P = .99), whereas ICANS occurred more frequently with axi-cel than with tisa-cel (42% vs 17%; P = .008). After inverse probability of treatment weighting, efficacy outcomes were largely similar, but axi-cel remained associated with significantly higher toxicity. In real-world settings, both axi-cel and tisa-cel demonstrated efficacy in patients with R/R FL, although PFS was inferior to that reported in clinical trials.

Indexed as

Immunotherapy, AdoptiveLymphoma, FollicularAdultAgedBiological ProductsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReceptors, Antigen, T-CellRecurrenceRetrospective StudiesTreatment Outcomeaxicabtagene ciloleucelBiological ProductsReceptors, Antigen, T-Celltisagenlecleucel

Identifiers

PMID41747197
PMCPMC13234464

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.