ArticleBlood advances2026
Real-world outcomes and toxicities of CAR-T in relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma: a multicenter cohort study.
Article in Blood advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Real-world outcomes of bispecific antibody therapy after chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy in follicular lymphoma.Blood cancer journal · 2026Article
- CAR in R/R FL: is real-world efficacy meeting expectations?Blood advances · 2026Article
- Optimizing CAR-T therapy delivery in the Italian healthcare system: economic and organizational insights in follicular lymphoma.Global & regional health technology assessmentArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
29 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractChimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy has revolutionized the treatment of relapsed/refractory (R/R) follicular lymphoma (FL). Real-world efficacy and toxicity data are needed because clinical trial populations are often unrepresentative. Therefore, we conducted a multicenter retrospective study of R/R FL patients undergoing commercial axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) or tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel) between 2021 and 2024. End points included efficacy measures (overall response rate [ORR], complete response rate [CRR], progression-free survival [PFS], and overall survival [OS]) and toxicity (rates of cytokine release syndrome [CRS] and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome [ICANS]). Among 136 patients, 100 (74%) received axi-cel and 36 (26%) received tisa-cel. Axi-cel patients were younger than tisa-cel patients (median age, 60 vs 68 years; P = .001) and received bendamustine lymphodepletion less often than them (9% vs 33%; P< .001). Median follow-up was 14.4 months (range, 0.8-72.0 months). In the unweighted analysis, compared with tisa-cel, axi-cel was associated with higher ORR (96% vs 80%; P = .007), CRR (88% vs 71%; P = .024), and longer median PFS (30.5 months vs 11.9 months; P = .021). Median OS did not differ significantly between the 2 products (not reached vs 23.6 months; P = .061). The rates of CRS were comparable (75% vs 75%; P = .99), whereas ICANS occurred more frequently with axi-cel than with tisa-cel (42% vs 17%; P = .008). After inverse probability of treatment weighting, efficacy outcomes were largely similar, but axi-cel remained associated with significantly higher toxicity. In real-world settings, both axi-cel and tisa-cel demonstrated efficacy in patients with R/R FL, although PFS was inferior to that reported in clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.