ArticleScientific reports2026
Evaluating the effectiveness and safety of Azvudine for hospitalised patients with COVID-19 and hypertension: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hypertension is widely acknowledged as a major risk factor for disease severity and death in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Azvudine is recommended for COVID-19 patients in China. However, its clinical efficacy and safety for individuals with hypertension remain unclear. This nine-center retrospective cohort study included 32,864 hospitalized COVID-19 patients in Henan Province, China, from December 2022 to January 2023. Among these patients, those with hypertension were identified and divided into the Azvudine and control groups (standard treatment without antiviral medication) after propensity score matching (PSM) at a 1:1 ratio. The primary outcomes measured were all-cause mortality and composite disease progression. Subgroup analyses and sensitivity tests were conducted to verify the robustness of the results. Safety was assessed based on adverse events (AEs). After PSM to balance baseline characteristics, the analysis included 2434 Azvudine recipients and 2434 controls, forming a final matched cohort. Azvudine was associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality (HR: 0.64, 95% CI 0.519-0.780; P < 0.001) and composite disease progression (HR: 0.84, 95% CI 0.719-0.985; P = 0.032) in hypertensive patients with COVID-19. In five sensitivity analyses, Azvudine showed a highly robust effect in reducing all-cause mortality, while the evidence for a reduction in the progression of composite disease progression was less consistent. No significant difference in severe AEs (≥ Grade 3) was observed between groups. These real-world findings suggest Azvudine may be a promising antiviral option for hypertensive COVID-19 patients, but further prospective trials are necessary to confirm these results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.