ArticleNature neuroscience2026
Personalized brain decoding of spontaneous pain in individuals with chronic pain.
Article in Nature neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neural encoding of pain is robust within but unstable between individuals.PLoS biology · 2026Article
- From Association to Prediction: Translational Barriers in Pain Biomarker Research.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Article
- Towards a holistic understanding of pain in the biomarker age.Nature neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Spontaneous pain is a hallmark of chronic pain disorders, but its assessment remains limited by the lack of objective biomarkers. Here we used precision functional magnetic resonance imaging data, collected over more than half a year from two individuals with chronic pain, to develop personalized brain-decoding models of spontaneous pain. The personalized decoding models accurately tracked fluctuations in spontaneous pain intensity across sessions, runs and minutes (Participant 1: prediction-outcome correlation, r = 0.40-0.61; Participant 2: r = 0.51-0.65) and effectively discriminated between median-dichotomized high- versus low-pain states (Participant 1: area under the curve = 0.71-0.87; Participant 2: area under the curve = 0.76-0.93). Model performance improved with increased training data, with conventional data quantities failing to achieve significant predictive accuracy. Furthermore, each model relied on individually unique brain features and did not generalize across participants. This study indicates that functional magnetic resonance imaging can assess spontaneous pain, highlighting the need for precise, patient-specific approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41748786What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.