ArticleScientific reports2026
Pretreatment tumor infiltrating lymphocytes and outcome in patients with HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer treated with CDK4/6 inhibitors.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Growing evidence suggests that enhancement of the tumor immune response contributes to the antitumor activity of CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i), but the role of pretreatment tumor immune microenvironment is not clear. We retrospectively investigated in patients with HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer receiving CDK4/6i and endocrine therapy whether pretreatment stromal tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) were associated with outcome. A total of 100 patients were evaluable 53 treated with palbociclib, 44 with ribociclib and 3 with abemaciclib. Tumors were classified as sTILs positive (sTILs+) when sTILs were ≥ 10%. 58 tumors were sTILs negative (sTILs-) and 42 sTILs+. sTILs were not associated with any outcome overall and in the ribociclib cohort. Conversely, patients treated with palbociclib and sTILs+ tumors experienced a statistically significant improved overall survival (mOS Not Reached vs. 41.1 months, p = .038) and a reduced risk of visceral progression (24 vs. 8 patients p=.0048) as compared with patients with sTILs- tumors. Pretreatment sTILs levels were associated with outcome in patients treated with palbociclib. Given the lack of interaction between treatment and sTILs our findings warrant validation in larger, independent cohorts and if confirmed propose sTILs as a simple and reproducible biomarker to aid patient selection for palbociclib.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.