ArticleThe journal of behavioral health services & research2026
Mental Health Literacy for Professionals Working with At-Risk Youth.
Article in The journal of behavioral health services & research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study evaluated the factor structure of a measure of mental health literacy (MHL) tailored to the role of helping professionals and assessed its association with help-seeking intentions among a sample of 946 child-serving professionals. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to model different factor structures of MHL for supporting youth, item response theory examined item discrimination, and structural equation modeling tested the relationship between MHL for supporting youth and help-seeking intentions. Results provided support for a higher order factor of MHL for supporting youth, with four first-order factors (i.e., mental health knowledge, attitudes/beliefs, perceived behavior control, subjective peer norms). Item discrimination varied across observed items and first-order factors. The second-order, multidimensional MHL factor was positively correlated with help-seeking intentions. These findings provide an initial step in validating a measure of MHL that accounts for the specific work roles and population characteristics unique to at-risk youth and aligns with prior definitions of MHL and the Theory of Planned Behavior. Future research should seek to replicate these findings across diverse service settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41748991What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.