ArticleBMC microbiology2026
Impact of captivity on gut microbiota, tracheal microbiota and metabolic pathways in wild chipmunks.
Article in BMC microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundUnderstanding the effects of captivity on wild animals is essential, as it helps to improve the physical health and welfare of captive wild animals. The changes in environment, diet and other factors during the captivity may reshape their internal microbiota and affect the body’s metabolism. Using 16S rRNA gene sequencing, we analyzed gut and tracheal microbiota from wild and captive chipmunks, and examined differences in serology, histopathology, fat metabolism, and muscle quality.
resultsThe dominant bacterial phyla in the gut and tracheal microbiota of chipmunks are Firmicutes, Bacteroidota, and Proteobacteria, with the gut and tracheal microbiota of captive chipmunks showing an increase in the Spirochaetota and Patescibacteria at the phylum level. No major organ (the heart, lung, colon, muscle and kidney) damage was observed in captive chipmunks. Fat metabolism analysis revealed increased expression of genes related to fat processing (PPARG, ACACA, FASN, ELOVL1, LPL, and SCD). Muscle gene expression analysis showed higher levels of MYH1, MYH2, and MYH7, in captive chipmunks.
conclusionsThese findings suggest that core bacterial types remained largely stable, but there were shifts in bacterial types that aid digestion during the laboratory captivity. Meanwhile, the fat metabolism of the captive chipmunks also changed, which supports muscle fatty acid absorption, and shifts muscle fiber types from fast to slow, promoting muscle synthesis and energy efficiency in captive chipmunks. Our study provides new insights into the influence of laboratory captivity on wild animals, establishes a foundation for facilitating the transformation of wild chipmunks into experimental animals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.