ArticleBMC geriatrics2026
Crafting the ideal multidimensional active ageing intervention with wearables for older adults: insights from a qualitative study.
Article in BMC geriatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Some Italian regions have the oldest population and considering the European ageing trend, it is necessary to foster active ageing interventions that could help the population age in a more active way. This study aimed to gather older adults’ preferences and expectations about a multidisciplinary health intervention, also adopting a wearable device. Health domains such as physical activity, diet and mental health were addressed. Online individual interviews using a semi-structured protocol were conducted between April 12 and 30, 2024. Participants were eligible if older adults (+60), and no other restrictions were set. At the beginning of each interview, a detailed multidimensional health intervention was described to the participant and then questions were asked about it. The Reflexive Thematic Analysis approach was adopted to analyse data. Twenty volunteers were interviewed (mean age±SD: 71,2±5,3 years; men/women: 6/14) and from their transcriptions, 4 themes were created: 1) “Empower to Flourish: Senior-Defined Key Focus Areas for Active Ageing Programs”, 2) “Silver Expectations: Revealing the Needs and Desires of Seniors for Active Ageing”, 3) “Optimal Setup: Best Practices for Designing and Implementing Senior Active Ageing Programs” and 4) “Tech-Enabled Ageing: Wearables Impact on Senior Health”. A practical guide for crafting and developing the ideal active ageing intervention for older adults, adopting a wearable device was created. Interventions should address health spheres (e.g., physical activity, sleep, social aspects), hobbies and cultural aspects, emphasising long-lasting cooperation with local institutions to have sustainable and effective interventions. Moreover, adopting a completely autonomous wearable device could enhance the intervention’s effectiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.