ArticleBMC public health2026
Decomposition and comparative analysis of differences in loneliness between urban and rural older adults: evidence from a national survey.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLoneliness is a significant public health issue in China, particularly among the older population. This study sought to explore differences in the incidence of loneliness among older adults in urban versus rural regions and to quantify the contribution of relevant influencing factors.
methodsThis study assessed data from 13,735 older adults derived from the 2018 Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey (CLHLS). The chi-squared test was employed to examine the distribution characteristics of relevant indicators among older adults in the two regions. Logistic regression was utilized to explore the factors affecting loneliness in older adults across different areas. Additionally, the Fairlie decomposition analysis method was applied to quantify the four categories of influencing factors—demographic characteristics, sociological characteristics, personal lifestyle, and health status—that contributed to differences in loneliness and to estimate their respective contributions among urban and rural older adults.
resultsA total of 26.79% of older adults reported feeling lonely, with a higher proportion of rural older adults (27.77%) experiencing loneliness than their urban counterparts (24.27%). In rural regions, risk factors for loneliness included a body mass index (BMI) of < 18.5 kg/m², being widowed, and other marital statuses, as well as self-reported local income status as “rich.” Conversely, protective factors included being male, having an educational level of 1–6 years or ≥ 7 years, self-reported local income status as “average,” alcohol consumption, engaging in exercise, and self-reported health (SRH) as “good.” In urban areas, risk factors included being widowed or in other marital statuses, as well as self-reported local income status as “rich.” In contrast, protective factors comprised being ≥ 100 years old, engaging in exercise, having sleep durations of 6.0–7.9 h, 8.0–9.9 h, or ≥ 10 h, and self-rated health as “good.” The Fairlie decomposition analysis revealed that 95.38% of the disparity in loneliness symptoms stemmed from observable factors, whereas the remaining 4.62% was attributed to urban–rural differences. Factors such as gender, educational attainment, marital status, living conditions, self-reported local income level, alcohol consumption, physical exercise, sleep length, and SRH played a significant role in explaining the disparities in loneliness symptoms between the two groups.
conclusionOlder adults residing in rural regions exhibited a greater prevalence of loneliness than their counterparts in urban areas. This difference is mainly caused by gender, educational level, marital status, living status, self-reported local income status, drinking, exercise, sleep duration, and SRH. Addressing these influential factors of loneliness would aid in developing targeted and more precise intervention strategies specifically tailored to enhance the mental wellness of high-risk older adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.