Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41749181›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2026

Decomposition and comparative analysis of differences in loneliness between urban and rural older adults: evidence from a national survey.

Chaoqun Hu, Feng Li, Jinhao Shi, Yongchao Ding, Lei Yuan, Rui Xiao

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Chaoqun Hu *Faculty of Military Health Service, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Feng Li *Faculty of Military Health Service, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Jinhao Shi *Scientific Research and Academic Affairs, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Yongchao DingThe Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Lei YuanFaculty of Military Health Service, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China. yuanleigz@163.com.
Rui XiaoDepartment of Stomatology, the First Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100853, P. R. China. xiao_rui0809@163.com.

Funding

the National Social Science Fund of China 2023-SKJJ-C-021the Postgraduate Research Projects of the People's Liberation Army JY2023B092the Talent Plan of Naval Medical University 2025-Chaoqun Huthe Talent Plan of Naval Medical University 2025-Lei Yuan
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLoneliness is a significant public health issue in China, particularly among the older population. This study sought to explore differences in the incidence of loneliness among older adults in urban versus rural regions and to quantify the contribution of relevant influencing factors.

methodsThis study assessed data from 13,735 older adults derived from the 2018 Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey (CLHLS). The chi-squared test was employed to examine the distribution characteristics of relevant indicators among older adults in the two regions. Logistic regression was utilized to explore the factors affecting loneliness in older adults across different areas. Additionally, the Fairlie decomposition analysis method was applied to quantify the four categories of influencing factors—demographic characteristics, sociological characteristics, personal lifestyle, and health status—that contributed to differences in loneliness and to estimate their respective contributions among urban and rural older adults.

resultsA total of 26.79% of older adults reported feeling lonely, with a higher proportion of rural older adults (27.77%) experiencing loneliness than their urban counterparts (24.27%). In rural regions, risk factors for loneliness included a body mass index (BMI) of < 18.5 kg/m², being widowed, and other marital statuses, as well as self-reported local income status as “rich.” Conversely, protective factors included being male, having an educational level of 1–6 years or ≥ 7 years, self-reported local income status as “average,” alcohol consumption, engaging in exercise, and self-reported health (SRH) as “good.” In urban areas, risk factors included being widowed or in other marital statuses, as well as self-reported local income status as “rich.” In contrast, protective factors comprised being ≥ 100 years old, engaging in exercise, having sleep durations of 6.0–7.9 h, 8.0–9.9 h, or ≥ 10 h, and self-rated health as “good.” The Fairlie decomposition analysis revealed that 95.38% of the disparity in loneliness symptoms stemmed from observable factors, whereas the remaining 4.62% was attributed to urban–rural differences. Factors such as gender, educational attainment, marital status, living conditions, self-reported local income level, alcohol consumption, physical exercise, sleep length, and SRH played a significant role in explaining the disparities in loneliness symptoms between the two groups.

conclusionOlder adults residing in rural regions exhibited a greater prevalence of loneliness than their counterparts in urban areas. This difference is mainly caused by gender, educational level, marital status, living status, self-reported local income status, drinking, exercise, sleep duration, and SRH. Addressing these influential factors of loneliness would aid in developing targeted and more precise intervention strategies specifically tailored to enhance the mental wellness of high-risk older adults.

Indexed as

LonelinessRural PopulationUrban PopulationAgedAged, 80 and overChinaFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleRisk FactorsSocioeconomic FactorsChinaFairlie decompositionLonelinessOld adults

Identifiers

PMID41749181
PMCPMC13041290

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.