ReviewJournal of translational medicine2026
Cross-kingdom microbial interactions in the gut during inflammatory bowel disease.
Review in Journal of translational medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Berberine in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Integrative Regulation of the Microbiota-Immune-Barrier Axis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Frontier research and clinical application prospects of microbiome biomarkers in autoimmune diseases.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Clinical application of fecal microbiota transplantation and its influencing factors.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInflammatory bowel disease (IBD), including Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), is characterized by chronic, relapsing inflammation of the gastrointestinal tract. Recent studies emphasize the importance of gut microbiome dysbiosis in IBD pathogenesis, where interactions among bacteria, fungi, protozoa, and viruses contribute to inflammation, immune modulation, and epithelial barrier disruption.
methodsA comprehensive narrative literature review was conducted, focusing on human data and preclinical studies. Biomedical databases were searched for research related to microbial communities and their role in IBD development, specifically targeting microbial metabolites, gut fungi, protozoa, and viruses. Relevant studies were analyzed to assess their impact on immune pathways and microbial interactions.
resultsThe review reveals how different microbial kingdoms collaborate through bacteria-fungi, bacteria-protozoa, and phage-bacteria interactions, influencing metabolite production and immune system function. Specific microbial metabolites like short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), indoles, bile acids, and others play significant roles in regulating mucosal immunity and barrier function. Disruptions in these interactions lead to chronic inflammation and contribute to disease progression. Multi-kingdom therapies, including probiotics, yeast-based treatments, and fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT), show promise but face challenges due to clinical variability.
conclusionUnderstanding IBD as a disruption of microbial ecosystems enables the development of personalized treatment strategies. Multi-omics studies and microbiome-based interventions targeting specific microbial interactions hold potential for more effective, individualized therapies in IBD management. However, further research and larger clinical trials are necessary for translating these findings into routine clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.